A few years ago, we received an email from an internal candidate we’d interviewed for a client:
“John, you and I met over a year ago during the course of my firm’s Chief Financial Officer search, where I was the internal candidate. While I was not chosen for the position, you communicated often during the course of the search and told me that, regardless of whether I was selected, I was a valuable asset. When I was not selected, you also told me that it would clearly become evident why someone else was chosen. You were spot-on in your assessment. I have learned so much from [the successful candidate] because of her many years in our industry … Thank you for your professionalism.”
All of us in the search business have conducted searches where the client recommends an employee of the company for the position. Many times, this happens because the client wants to conduct a broad search and believes that the candidate is good but wants to cover the marketplace. Sometimes, the client questions whether the internal candidate is appropriate, but wants the assessment of the search firm.
Here is what two executives have said about their experience as an internal candidate:
President of a midwestern bank who was considered for a position in the bank’s holding company:
Bob, the internal candidate, commented that his inclusion as an internal candidate seemed like an afterthought. The search firm (not The Alexander Group) never provided him with a position description and did not communicate. “While the search firm spent 90 minutes interviewing me, they had not studied my resume to determine whether or not I would be a fit with the position. It was clear they had made their mind up before the process started. The first question I was asked was ‘Why did you choose Notre Dame for college?’ This is not a question you ask a 57-year-old man.” He never heard from the search firm again, even after an external candidate was selected for the position. Bob believes neither the holding company nor search firm treated him well.
Vice President of Compliance with a Fortune 50 company:
Paula learned about the internal opportunity directly from the hiring manager. The hiring manager responded back very positively that he would be happy to have her added to the candidate slate and that she would be contacted by the search firm handling the search. Paula was interviewed in person by the search firm and was pleased with the time spent to assess her potential candidacy. She applauded the search firm’s efforts to understand the newly created role within the company. While Paula was not selected for the role, she remains extremely supportive of the hiring manager and believes that being included in the interview process has only improved her visibility in the company for other positions.
There are several things that a search firm can do to improve the internal candidate’s experience:
An internal candidate who has gone through a rigorous, unbiased interview process—and is selected—will enter the role with confidence that they are indeed the most qualified person for the position. If they don’t get the role, then they know they played on a level playing field and, from a career development perspective, will be even more prepared for the next opportunity.
At The Alexander Group, we are paid for the process, not the person. If the client recommends an internal candidate, she or he is just as much our candidate as any external talent we identify. Ignore the internal candidate and you run the risk of missing out on a great talent, and possibly, a future client.
Article updated January 16, 2019.