Sally King Archives - The Alexander Group

Concept of law firm merger integration - hands putting black and white puzzle pieces together.

Law firm mergers hit a record high in 2024 as firms sought to leverage practices, expand geographies, and supplement areas of expertise. But while many firms emphasize strategic alignment and cultural compatibility, the real challenge lies in effective law firm merger integration. Leaders often tout how mergers will expand their geographical footprint or align practices, but without a clear integration strategy, these promises can fall short.

Beyond Lawyers: Why Business Services Integration Matters in Law Firm Mergers

Most firms with more than 100 lawyers have professional management of their firms by seasoned business executives. Although a priority of merged firms is integrating practices and leveraging client relationships, it is also important to integrate the business services of the newly combined firm.

Understanding how to grow a law firm effectively requires adding lawyers or expanding practices and ensuring that business services are seamlessly integrated during mergers. However, I don’t believe there is sufficient discussion about the integration of the executives, managers, and teams who fill the combined firm’s business roles and who help keep the proverbial trains running on time and ensure the culture of the newly formed firm is nurtured and supported.

Strategies for Operational Law Firm Merger Integration

It is key for a successful transition to include and engage lawyers in the merged firm in a thoughtful approach to integrating business professionals and systems. Engaging law firm merger consultants can provide valuable guidance in navigating the complexities of law firm merger integration, from merging business systems to ensuring operational efficiencies.

Combining the professional functions should result in operational efficiencies. Typical law firm mergers support the belief that 1 + 1 does not equal 2 for these functions but should perhaps equal somewhere from 1.2 to 1.5, depending on the function.

If, for example, the finance department of each firm has 40 staff members, it is unlikely that the combined finance department of the merged firm will need 80 staff members. The new finance team could decrease from a combined 80 staff to approximately 60 people. Similarly, there will not be a need for two Chief Financial Officers.

I use the finance function and numbers to illustrate this discussion. The same applies to business development and marketing, information technology, human resources, and other professional functions.

Law firm business leaders and the teams who report to them are often long-tenured, trusted professionals who frequently have deep relationships with lawyers throughout the firm. Some have been loyal cheerleaders who help support and maintain a firm culture.

Many of these managers’ titles do not reflect the depth of their knowledge, their work, and the relationships they have built with attorneys. And perhaps most importantly, titles do not convey the institutional memory business managers may carry.

Choosing the Right Leaders: Crafting a Unified C-Suite

The integration team should take a thoughtful and comprehensive approach to the combined firm C-suite for a successful merger. Selecting the Chief Operating Officer of the merged firm may be a foregone conclusion if one firm is perceived as the “dominant” firm.

While selecting leaders from within the merging firms is often the first consideration, an external executive search firm can provide a valuable objective perspective.

By thoroughly assessing leadership needs, skills gaps, and organizational goals, external experts can ensure that the combined leadership team is equipped to drive success. This objectivity helps address potential biases or blind spots in internal selection processes, enabling firms to build a leadership team that aligns with strategic goals.

Avoiding One-Sided Leadership Decisions During Law Firm Merger Integration

Keep in mind these transactions are always presented as mergers – not as acquisitions, even if one side has significantly more heft and investment in the eventual outcome. Making decisions automatically may not be in the best interest of the newly combined firm for many reasons, including skill set, experience, relationships, temperament, flexibility, ability to lead a change management effort, and likely ability to successfully bring new players into their team.

The smaller firm may have superstars amongst their C-suites, and the more prominent firm may have someone in place who is simply keeping the seat warm because of their tenure. Similarly, selecting all the chiefs from one side of the combination will not lay the foundation for a smooth transition.

In some mergers, external hires have proven instrumental in achieving seamless integration and long-term success. For example, firms have brought in external Chief Operating Officers with specific experience in large-scale integrations to bridge operational and cultural divides. These external leaders often provide fresh perspectives and specialized skills that neither firm may possess internally, enabling a more robust integration strategy.

Building a Cohesive Business Framework

Firms must carefully consider how the professional teams will integrate and what systems and processes will be adopted. A well-drafted law firm merger agreement can be a foundational document outlining the integration plan for professional teams, systems, and processes. Firms should consider not only the experience of each manager but also their relationships and accomplishments and how they will work within the combined law firm. Asking thoughtful questions will illuminate who can lead the combined firm as it establishes its culture.

While adding lawyers from different geographies or practices is viewed as accretive — by increasing revenues and presumably profits, sometimes practices do not mesh well. Client conflicts, perceived lack of status in the new organization, or perhaps a concern that without the appropriate teams around them, they will not be able to effectively service their clients, which can prompt lawyers to leave.

Typically, these are guided departures, and inevitably, the departing lawyers wind up happily at another firm. And, of course, we know the moment a merger is announced, other firms will swoop in with potentially attractive offers for lawyers with good books of business and excellent reputations. The same, sadly, cannot be said for the business professionals of the firm, who may be asked to leave; they rarely, if ever, leave with a group or the team they have been working with, and may struggle to find new jobs.

Supporting Business Professionals Through Transition: A Human-Centered Approach

The answers for each merger will be different and often nuanced. As noted above, some members of the business services team will inevitably be without jobs in the new firm. It is important to those leaving and those left behind that leadership takes steps to ensure that the displaced business services professionals are supported properly throughout the process.

Firms with a business services integration plan or checklist are more likely to succeed because they have thought through their infrastructure, systems, and, most importantly, communication process to all constituents. In so doing, they will preserve the culture they have spoken about so eloquently.

The Path to Seamless Law Firm Integration: Leadership, Culture, and Strategy

Post-merger integration in a law firm requires meticulous planning to align not just the business systems but also the culture and operational frameworks of the newly combined entity. Integration takes time, transparency, and care. Developing a comprehensive law firm merger checklist ensures that every step of the integration process is accounted for, from leadership selection to operational alignment. Given the complexities of integrating business services and aligning cultures, leveraging an unbiased, expert-led executive search process can be a critical success factor.

External search partners, like The Alexander Group, provide a neutral, data-driven approach to evaluating potential leaders, whether internal or external. This ensures that leadership appointments are based on merit, alignment with strategic goals, and the ability to drive transformative change rather than on legacy or internal politics.

The Alexander Group, recognized as one of the country’s top CEO executive search firms, presents “Five Questions With Extraordinary Leaders,” our interview series with visionary industry leaders. In this installment, Managing Director Sally King interviews Michael Caplan, COO of Lowenstein Sandler, discussing leadership style and advice for those seeking a Chief Operating Officer role at a large professional services or law firm.

Michael Caplan believes in diving in.

All in.

It’s how he connects with his team, peers, partners, and clients. Caplan is intentional about his leadership style, setting expectations and seeking growth opportunities. He interacts, listens, and strategizes with the goal of positively impacting his professional leadership team, attorneys, and firm.

With more than 30 years of experience in the accounting, financial, investment, and consulting industries and 20 years of corporate legal and law firm experience, Caplan takes a holistic approach to his role.

He combines his understanding of the business of law and his financial acumen with effective communication skills and a strategic approach to challenges.

Caplan joined Lowenstein Sandler in March 2024. A national law firm with over 350 lawyers based in New York, New Jersey, Palo Alto, Utah, and Washington, D.C., the firm represents leaders in virtually every sector of the global economy, particularly emphasizing investment funds, life sciences, and technology. It is recognized for its entrepreneurial spirit and high standard of client service.

Caplan believes Lowenstein is poised for exponential growth, and he is ready to lead the way.

Read on for Caplan’s “Five Questions With Extraordinary Leaders” conversation with King.

You recently joined Lowenstein but have served in this kind of role for over 10 years. How did you navigate your transition from Professional Services firms to law firms?

I’m a business-oriented COO, and I have a client’s perspective. This approach has served me well in corporations across various sectors and serves me well as COO at Lowenstein.

Learning about law firm culture requires an understanding of practice groups, building relationships with partners, and how these elements work together in a competitive industry. But effectively leading any organization requires knowledge of basic business principles: What is

demand? What is productivity utilization? How should we think about our business differently? Why is revenue different from profit?

Additionally, I am very focused on how the law firm’s professional staff should be involved in client development, specifically in areas of operational expertise. I take these basic tenets and incorporate them into what I call “the business of law.” At Lowenstein, we have even branded these as “BEST—Business Enterprise Solutions Team.”

As a law firm COO, I work with both the attorneys and the business professionals who support them to facilitate the firm’s success. Internally, we are a team, and every participant understands their own value —what each of us brings to the firm. Externally, we need to differentiate ourselves from our competition in an increasingly competitive environment. One of the ways we do this is by helping clients with their operational effectiveness and operational excellence.

Lowenstein was looking for a leader on the business side who could help them think about how the firm can grow and adapt in the future —across different categories and different work streams. I am now part of the leadership team that is discussing and planning how to scale the firm. This was a big part of what attracted me to join Lowenstein. After working in legal operations for two decades, this opportunity was more than being strategic. It is leading-edge and innovative, and leading a team that can engage in driving revenue and the business is pretty cool.

I relish having this seat at the table at Lowenstein, where the partners are eager to discuss best practices and growth strategies.

Recently, we’ve been focused on a strategic plan that leverages the business of law to serve our clients, our colleagues, and our communities. We are looking at lateral partner hiring, innovative technology and solutions, data and business intelligence, cross-selling, conflicts, and lateral partner hiring, and we are looking at these elements in new ways. This approach will enable the firm to grow, be competitive, and STAY competitive— not only in our tier-one practices but how across all of our different groups from a cross-selling, collaborative perspective.

What have some of your biggest challenges been in law firms? Having 20/20 vision in hindsight, what might you change, and what might you do exactly the same?

The role of a COO is different today than it was ten—even five years ago. A COO must communicate with partners so that the focus is on attracting profitable clients and efficiently running the business and practicing law. In addition to building a focus on lawyers, the firm must also invest in firm infrastructure and non-legal talent.

Today, we are seeing law firms that resist change. The COO can play a big role here. Firms have to allow their COOs to have a voice, and partners with senior leadership need to promote and mandate that the COO have a voice. A strong COO with excellent communication skills can bring the partners in and drive change. On the other hand, if a firm has a COO unwilling to get out in front of a partnership that’s not letting the COO get out front, it will be ineffective in taking its law firm to the next level.

It is important for any COO to establish relationships with partners so that they feel heard. Trust is very important. Once that is established, a COO can then effectively communicate to the partners how investing in the firm will help their practice. Any strategy will only be successful if the culture and partnership support it.

Currently, there is a highly competitive marketplace for clients and C-Suite leaders. I’m trying to hire chief officers, different levels of directors, and others within my professional staff with a strategic view of the business. Of course, every other law firm is seeking the same type of talent! However, Lowenstein Sandler offers an excellent proposition for highly qualified candidates because our firm truly values the opinions of its business strategists.

Now, looking back as an 11-year tenured COO of a law firm, I don’t get too bothered by the challenges that I faced earlier in my career. I’ve learned to take challenges in stride, reflect, and partner with other people to solve problems. I spend a lot of time with partners and our Chiefs brainstorming, strategizing and thinking about messaging and how to handle people challenges: how do we think holistically about where we want our teams to go and how do we get them there?

Running a law firm is not that difficult from an operational standpoint. But running a firm of partners and professional staff is the hardest part of the job. The people part of the job is challenging because you are literally managing “talent.” Every day can bring up new challenges from a people standpoint, but it is both challenging and invigorating as a leader.

What are some of the challenges you see on the horizon that you will need to address, and what is your game plan?

AI presents an opportunity, but it’s a challenge. Where do we begin? How much data do we have? What is the data that the clients have? How are we thinking about our rate structures? How are we thinking about our hiring plans? How are we thinking about leveraging our profitability model? How are we getting in front of these communication plans with our clients?

AI presents a significant opportunity to engage clients, attorneys, and professional staff, but how do we address this? What comes first, second, third? Every vendor has a solution. I get 500 emails a day from unfamiliar vendors who want to solve all my problems.

Our chairman, Gary Wingens, and our full leadership and strategic planning committee are very focused on AI information and innovation. That is how we are managing this roadmap of products, data, communication, and client relationships as we guide our firm’s growth.

The other challenge is the growth of the lateral partner market. As a competitive national law firm, we want to grow our practices and become a destination firm for our key practices with lateral partners. But we are competing with many firms for the same lateral partner hires. The challenge is how we continue to be that destination firm and grow with the strategic plan of lateral partner hiring; as COO, I have to evaluate how to scale my teams to meet our projected growth.

If we hire 200 lawyers in the next two-and-a-half to three years, how many BD people do I need? What does practice management mean? How do we manage paralegals? How do we look at conflicts? How do I look at my recruiting team? How many billers and collectors do we need? Yet, at the same time, how do you manage the expense growth before the revenue comes in when you’re making partners so you continue to be very profitable? This analysis requires a strategic view of how to manage the challenges of expense and investment, along with the revenue that will come in behind it.

What do you look for when hiring your chief team or people who will report to you, and how do you ensure you have a good mix of leadership attributes amongst your team? What is your leadership and communication style?

I believe that chief officers all need to have real leadership. To me, this is table stakes. I operate as a COO, and I manage a team of people, but it’s a very flat organization. I love to embrace leaders and resources at all levels because I really try to truly create career aspirations for the folks who are on my teams. I want my teams to invest in their careers. It is not just about title and promotion, but there’s responsibility. Learn the firm, learn the partners, learn the practices, lead at every level. I’m really looking for people that are hungry, people that love to work, are excited and have ideas, and are not afraid to talk about them.

What advice would you give someone wanting to be a COO at a large professional services or law firm? How does Lowenstein manage succession for these roles, and how do you think other firms manage that process?

First of all, my advice to somebody who wants to be a COO is that you have to really invest in getting to know that firm. You have to truly take on the job as an owner.

I tell everybody whom I hire to take the first six months to a year and get to know people, build relationships, learn the firm, go on a listening tour, get on airplanes, go to different offices, make sure you work out a lot because you’re going to have a lot of meals and a lot of coffee, but listen and learn. If you really truly want to be successful at the job of the COO, you have to build trust with your partners. And then you also have to build trust with your team under you, so that they will embrace you as the COO and keep you in the loop.

A reputation can be made or broken very quickly. You have to be willing to make those investments and sometimes sacrifices to be a very successful COO. The other piece of advice I would give is you’ve got to understand the financials. You have to truly get how the firm makes money, how we bill, how we collect, how we look at rates, how we price, what profitability means, what staffing and leverage utilization, productivity, demand go down the line, what is contribution? If you don’t understand the numbers of a law firm, it’s very hard to be a COO.

HOUSTON—The Alexander Group proudly announces the addition of seasoned international executive Sally King to the firm’s advisory and consulting team. King brings extensive experience in global operations, strategic planning, merger planning and integration, finance, and all aspects of operational management to the consulting role.

King will play a pivotal part in furthering The Alexander Group’s mission to provide unparalleled strategic guidance to its diverse clientele. With more than 30 years of experience working with global, national, and regional law firms, King’s knowledge expands The Alexander Group’s ability to serve clients through team and executive assessment, advisory, and consulting strategies.

“We have followed Sally’s career and her impact on the firms for whom she has worked for decades,” said John Lamar, Managing Director at The Alexander Group. “She is an outstanding thought leader in this rapidly evolving industry.”

Prior to joining The Alexander Group, King served as Regional Chief Operating Officer for Clifford Chance, Chief Operating Officer for Dentons and Akin Gump, completing her career at Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler.

“I am excited to embark on this new journey with The Alexander Group,” said Sally King. “I have long admired the firm’s dedication to excellence and its unwavering commitment to client success.”

King holds an MBA from Columbia University Graduate School of Business and is a fellow of the College of Law Practice Management and has served on the Boards of British American Business, Infinite Global Consulting, and the Board of Advisors for Catalyst. She is a certified Executive Coach and a member of the International Coaching Council. King was also a Special Advisor to the New York State Bar Association Committee on Law Practice Management.