What do Walmart, Berkshire Hathaway, Dell, Comcast, Publix, and Ford have in common? All are among the nation’s largest companies and members of the Fortune 100. Each of them is “family-owned,” which is loosely defined as having two or more family members involved and a majority of ownership or control within the family. Family-owned businesses date back centuries to family farms and, in urban settings, shops, and businesses where the family lived above the premises. In both examples, all family members actively participated in producing the family’s livelihood.

Although many people think of family-owned businesses as making up only a small part of the economy, the following 2021 statistics from Family Business reveal that family-owned businesses:

Employ 23 percent of the US workforce, accounting for 32.6 million jobs;
Generating 23 percent of private-sector GDP or $3.2 trillion; and
Total 9.1 million businesses, representing 25 percent of all business tax returns.
Pressure to Keep it in The Family—Challenges in Hiring Family Members:

The family-business owner, like all business owners, should be concerned about having the best talent in appropriate roles. This can pose a challenge when hiring family members for key positions. Are they the best qualified? It is important to establish hiring and position requirements and uniformly adhere to them when considering family. These guidelines help avoid the pressure to hire a family member only because they are a family member. Many family companies encourage the next generation of family interested in the business to work for another company for several years to gain general business knowledge and experience to be eligible to join the family business.

When family members choose to work for another company in the same industry, they gain added perspective and familiarity with accepted industry-specific best practices. Family members who work outside the family business can gain increased credibility with other family members and the board. Family businesses should communicate hiring criteria for all positions, which not only sets the standard for talent management but can avoid future misunderstandings and conflicts.

The family business owner should ensure that every employee, whether a family member or not, receives the training needed to allow them to function successfully. Placing a family member in a role for which they lack the appropriate skills without a plan to provide the needed training can cause tension, low morale, and family drama. Family member executives must be assessed on their own merits. Each position should have yearly goals so that the family member can be evaluated objectively and without favoritism.

Strategically Hiring Outside The Family:

Hiring nonfamily members, especially doing so for the first time, can be challenging. Many companies decide to hire nonfamily members when the owners want to accelerate the company’s growth. Other companies hire nonfamily members when the company needs specific skills such as legal, international, or financial expertise. The challenge then becomes ensuring that the nonfamily member is a good fit with the organization’s culture and the family itself, especially if the company is small. Marc Sharpe, Chairman of the Family Office Association, reports that individuals who are comfortable with a “servant leadership style” in which one leads by putting the needs of their team first can be an excellent personality fit for a family business.

He adds that while hiring a nonfamily manager is often done to acquire a specific skill set, it is also important to hire individuals who have the flexibility to take on a generalist role when needed. If companies are recruiting nonfamily members for a position to replace a family member, it is important to communicate the reason for the hire and have detailed position requirements. If the company’s management are not in full agreement to hire a nonfamily executive, it will be a difficult and possibly unsuccessful hire.

To avoid and resolve family conflict, it is important in the recruitment and retention of outside candidates to ensure the family business has well-defined business procedures and corporate governance. Also, making decisions informally outside the office will put the nonfamily member at a disadvantage.

Best Practices for Executives Joining a Family Business:

Individuals who work for family businesses agree that it can either be a rewarding or disappointing experience depending on a number of factors, and we recommend that any executive considering joining a family business evaluate the following:

Has the family agreed on the hire?
How well has the position been defined?
How many individuals have previously held the same position? Turnover, particularly in the C-suite, can be a red flag indicating that the family is not ready for a nonfamily executive;
How are business decisions made? Cultural fit may be influenced by whether the business owner makes key decisions independently or in a distributed fashion;
How does the team operate in terms of executing the business? A well-functioning team is empowered to operationalize projects and business imperatives timely and successfully;
Understand the business owner’s goals; recognize these goals may be focused on objectives other than increasing revenue and growth, such as philanthropy or creating a legacy;
Evaluate the strengths and challenges of the current team and look for signs of dysfunction among family members;
Get to know family members individually, because they may have different goals and objectives; what are the family dynamics in play?

The Alexander Group, a leading financial executive search firm, recently completed a successful placement for Lisinski Law. This effort highlights our expertise in sourcing top legal talent and matching it with leadership needs within law firms.

Key Points:

  • The Alexander Group demonstrates expertise as a top financial executive search firm.
  • Successful executive recruitment for a financial role at Lisinski Law by The Alexander Group.
  • Introduction of Jill Yutzy Coen at Lisinski Law as Vice President of Legal Operations.
TAG, a financial executive search firm assists in filling role at Lisinski Law

Jill Yutzy Coen has joined Lisinski Law as the newly created Vice President of Legal Operations. Ms. Coen is an experienced operational leader with a core skill set that includes regulatory expertise, compliance, risk management, litigation, and reporting. Before joining Lisinski, Ms. Coen was the Executive Director of Regulatory Operations at JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Learn more about Ms. Coen here.

The Alexander Group’s expertise as a financial executive search firm has allowed us to understand the complexities of placing top-tier financial talent in leading roles. The Alexander Group worked closely with Lisinski Law to identify key competencies required for executive recruitment for a financial role. This ensured that Jill Yutzy Coen was an ideal fit for their firm’s strategic needs.

“Jill’s experience as a practicing attorney and an operations leader made her an ideal candidate for this role. As the assignment progressed, it became clear that there was a strong alignment in philosophy between Jill and the team at Lisinski, and we look forward to seeing the impact that Jill can have now that she has joined Angel and her team at Lisinski Law,” said Jonathan Verlander, Managing Director, The Alexander Group.

Established in the fall of 2020, Lisinski Law is a swiftly expanding immigration law firm that has already served over 15,000 clients and built a strong record of success in handling complex immigration cases. The firm’s dedicated attorneys bring extensive trial and immigration expertise and impeccable reputations to clients nationwide—often representing those turned away by other firms.

With a team of 700 professionals, Lisinski Law primarily assists clients in securing legal status through humanitarian-focused immigration cases, such as T-Visas for victims of human trafficking, U-Visas for crime victims, and VAWA relief under the Violence Against Women Act for survivors of abuse or extreme cruelty.

As a top financial executive recruiter, The Alexander Group takes pride in delivering outstanding recruitment services that meet the specific needs of the legal industry. Our track record with Lisinski Law is a testament to our commitment to excellence in executive placement for law firms.

We are dedicated to cultivating enduring partnerships with our law firm clients. This relationship affords us a profound understanding of each firm’s distinct culture and requirements, enabling us to employ innovative strategies that transcend conventional legal boundaries in order to secure the most suitable candidates.

This search was conducted and completed by Managing Directors John Mann and Jonathan Verlander. Read more about our expertise as a financial executive search firm.

The Alexander Group, recognized as one of the top CEO executive search firms, presents “Five Questions With Outstanding Leaders,” our series where we interview visionary industry leaders. In this edition, we speak with Jonathan Horowitz, President of the Houston Hospitality Alliance, about key challenges, successes, and future opportunities within the hospitality sector.

Jonathan Horowitz and friends for top ceo executive search firms blog
©MorrisMalakoff

Houston is a foodie city.

Full stop.

Houston offers every global cuisine, and diners are only too happy to explore and experience what the city is serving.

However, Houston’s hospitality and tourism are more than its vibrant dining scene.

Just ask Jonathan Horowitz, president of the Houston Hospitality Alliance.

Managing Director John Mann of The Alexander Group, one of the nations’s top CEO executive search firms, sat down with Horowitz to discuss the business of Houston’s hospitality and tourism industries–struggles, successes, and the future.

Horowitz’s deep experience within the hospitality industry and his background as an attorney and real estate agent made him the ideal hire for the high-profile president position. The HHA is an organization that strives to promote, connect, and energize Houston’s hospitality and tourism business and create industry success in Houston.

For more than 17 years, Horowitz developed, operated and led multiple marketing restaurant/bar concepts, including Legacy Restaurants (Original Ninfa’s on Navigation Tex-Mex restaurant and the Antone’s Famous Po’Boy sandwich concept) Lasco Enterprises, LLC (The Tasting Room Wine Cafe, MAX’s Wine Dive, Boiler House Texas Grill) Midway Hospitality Development and Convive Hospitality Consulting, a full-service hospitality consulting service. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Rice University and a JD from South Texas College of Law.

Mr. Horowitz was a corporate executive search firm’s ideal candidate, and since being named HHA president in October 2023, Mr. Horowitz has addressed Houston City Council members at City Hall, discussed the Houston Hospitality Alliance and its mission to promote, represent, and advocate for the entire hospitality industry in Houston, and led the HHA Business Forum.

Horowitz is an ardent community supporter of many organizations, eager to illuminate the city while growing the HHA.

“I am thrilled that Jonathan joined the Houston Hospitality Alliance as the new President, bringing with him over two decades of leadership and innovation in the hospitality industry, as well as a deep-rooted commitment to the Houston community,” said Mann.

JM: Let’s discuss opportunities and challenges concerning hospitality development within the Houston landscape.

JH: We currently are in the most challenging environment ever for the entire hospitality industry. Prior to the pandemic, things were in a pretty good place; however, the pandemic changed everything for the industry. There are a few areas where hospitality continues to struggle:

JM: Houston is a destination for new businesses and conventions. How do you take advantage of that momentum moving forward?

JH: It’s all about providing a complete and memorable experience. Consumers expect more and more now, so they have to be “wowed” once they’re here. Many people have preconceived notions of Houston and don’t realize how diverse, cosmopolitan, and exciting the city really is. Once they get here – for whatever reason (business, pleasure, a convention, the Med Center, etc.), they come away with a great appreciation for what Houston offers. The overall hospitality industry in Houston is extremely strong, and once people get here and experience it, there’s a good chance they’ll come back.

JM: The Greater Houston Partnership’s latest data reports that almost 11% of Houston’s employment is in the Leisure and Hospitality sectors. How do you grow that industry?

JH: It’s happening – see above. New places are opening every day, and companies from all over the country are coming here because they recognize the great opportunities here.

JM: How does your background as a hospitality business professional and an attorney support your role as HHA president?

JH: I am fortunate in that I’ve seen both sides of the industry – having been an owner and operator, I can understand and empathize with those who are running hospitality businesses in the city, and I’ve been involved in a restaurant trade association for nearly two decades. These perspectives help me on a daily basis to help guide the HHA. As for being an attorney, that helps me all the time – not only with work but with general life issues. It’s a great education and experience to have, and it gives me a better understanding of how to deal with people, contracts, and potential disputes.

JM: What are the next steps of growth for the HHA?

JH: We are focused on growing membership every day. Just this year, we’ve doubled the number of members and are not slowing down. We recognize that, in order to keep members engaged and to attract new ones, we need to provide great value. We have four primary value propositions as an association:

As one of the top CEO executive search firms, The Alexander Group continues to engage with and learn from industry leaders like Jonathan Horowitz. By fostering deep relationships and understanding the specific needs of each client, The Alexander Group remains committed to elevating the quality of executive talent acquisition across industries, ensuring visionary leadership for businesses poised for growth. 

Learn more about their expertise and approach at The Alexander Group.

Leslie Diorio has joined Ice Miller LLP as Director of Legal Recruitment. Ms. Diorio is a dedicated recruiting executive skilled in management, strategy, talent assessment, training, and data analytics. Previously, Ms. Diorio was Vice President, Talent Recruiting at Axiom where she acquired more than 20 years of legal recruitment experience.

Learn more about Ms. Diorio here.

This search was conducted and completed by Managing Director John M. Mann and Associate Jonathan Daniels.

Patrick O’Connor has been named Chief Business Development & Marketing Officer for Holland & Knight LLP. Mr. O’Connor joins Holland & Knight from Big Four public accounting and consulting firm Ernst & Young LLP. He has more than 25 years of strategic and operational business development, marketing, and commercial leadership experience.

Learn more about Mr. O’Connor here.

Managing Directors John Lamar, Jean Lenzner, and William Lepiesza conducted and completed this search.

We’re excited to introduce “Five Questions With Outstanding Leaders,” our new interview series that highlights the success of our executive search firm. We’ll interview change-makers, visionaries, and thought leaders across all industries and sectors to examine how they achieve professional success that benefits their communities. Today, we’re highlighting our expertise in executive search for life sciences, including senior leadership hiring in life sciences for key roles in the biotech and pharma industry.

Beth Ehrgott, Executive Search Firm Managing Director

Beth Ehrgott, the Managing Director and Head of the Global Life Sciences Practice for the Alexander Group, a global executive search firm for life sciences and other sectors with offices in Houston, New York, San Francisco, Park City, San Diego, and Washington, D.C., conducted this interview.

She has performed an executive search for life sciences across various disciplines, including research and development, finance, corporate development, and technical operations. Her expertise extends to legal, corporate affairs, investor relations, IT, compliance, HR, and DEI. This breadth of experience makes her a trusted partner for life sciences leadership recruitment, ensuring that companies have the right leaders to drive innovation and growth. She has also worked with Fortune 500 companies and private equity and venture capital-backed clients in consumer goods, manufacturing, non-profits, retail, financial, and professional services.

Beth sits down with multi-hyphenate Luke Timmerman to discuss purpose-driven leadership, aligning resources with the mission, team dynamics, and more.

Life Science Cares: Combating Poverty with Life Science Industry Support

c level executive search firm interview group photo

Earlier this year, I was privileged to join the National Advisory Board for Life Science Cares.

Life Science Cares provides a platform for life science companies and their employees to make a difference in eradicating poverty. It raises money to award grants to community nonprofits that implement research-based survival, education, and economic sustainability solutions, supercharging these grants with volunteer hours, donated goods, strategic support, and advocacy. 

To date, Life Science Cares has awarded more than $9.5 million in grants and donated 30,000 volunteer hours to the communities of Boston, San Diego, New York, Philadelphia, and the Bay Area. 

Within the Life Science Cares community, many heroes raise money and donate their time in a myriad of ways. Because there is magic in the telling and some who are waiting for philanthropic inspiration, I am delighted to highlight Luke Timmerman, an extremely inspirational member of the Life Science Cares community and fellow national advisory board member.

About Luke Timmerman

Luke is a biotech journalist, author, entrepreneur, founder of Timmerman Report, a leading biotech industry newsletter, and author of “Hood: Trailblazer of the Genomics Age,” a biography of automated DNA sequencing pioneer Leroy Hood. Luke was named one of the 100 most influential people in biotech in 2015 by Scientific American.

Since 2017, Luke’s Timmerman Traverse Mountain Climbing Campaigns have catalyzed the biotech community to give back more than $10 million to fight cancer, poverty, and sickle cell disease. During his most recent climb in the North Cascades of Washington State, he and a team of biotech executives and investors gained between 6,000 and 8,000 feet of elevation, covering 20 miles of land. The Timmerman Traverse team hit its goal of raising $1 million for Life Science Cares!

Executive Search for Life Sciences interviewee, Luke Timmerman
Tracy, Geneva, and Luke

Five Questions from an Executive Search for Life Sciences Firm

Luke graciously answered my five questions below:

1.  When and how did the idea of climbing for charity come to you?

I started thinking about climbing for charity in the summer of 2017. I was at a point in my career when I established the Timmerman Report as a successful subscription-based publication for biotech industry professionals. Around the same time, I had gotten to a point in 15 years of mountaineering where I could seriously consider climbing Mt. Everest, the highest peak in the world. I thought that if I could push myself to climb Everest, that act would inspire the biotech community to give back to a charity that I care about.

2.  How did you pick your first beneficiary?

The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center had a pre-existing partnership with Alpine Ascents International. That was the guide service I knew I would climb Everest with. The partnership made perfect sense. As a journalist, I knew Fred Hutch scientists and their excellent work. Cancer research was at a moment of great possibility. I thought the biotech community could rally behind the climb of Everest and this excellent beneficiary organization.

3.  You have climbed Mount Everest, which is known to be extremely difficult and demanding, and imagine it requires significant training to be in proper shape to take this on. Are there long-term physical effects from the effort?

I had some cold sensitivity in my feet for a while afterward but no long-term physical effects. The experience was more important mentally. I came away believing I was capable of much more than I had ever previously thought possible. The sky was the limit. 

4.  What are the most important qualities to have in team members when making such challenging climbs?

Missionary drive. The people who are most successful on these campaigns are willing to put in the hard work it takes to be successful. That comes from a passionate belief in the cause, the feeling that what they are doing is worthwhile service for others.

5.  For others reading this who want to make a difference, what advice would you give them?

Find something you care about passionately in your bones. Think about what it is you have to offer in [terms of] skills and attributes that might contribute toward that cause. With so much instability in our world, it is important to reflect on the goodness of those trying to have an impact. 

Luke, thank you for your time, inspiring leadership, and contagious efforts to support Life Science Cares!

The Alexander Group: Providing Global Executive Search for Life Sciences Companies

The Alexander Group is a leading executive search firm for life sciences, specializing in C-level talent acquisition. With over 40 years of experience as a biotech and pharma executive search agency, we prioritize building strong relationships and understanding your unique needs to align talent with your organizational culture.

Our executive search consultants for life sciences provide C-suite recruitment, advisory support, and consulting. We are committed to diversity, ensuring leadership teams with broad perspectives to drive success. Beyond placements, we assist with board composition, management assessments, and succession planning, making us a comprehensive senior executive recruiting firm for your needs.

For more information about our C-level executive search firm, visit our website.

Ryan Kovach has joined PilotLegis as Assistant Executive Director. Mr. Kovach is a seasoned leader focusing on compliance, auditing, contract negotiation, policy development, information security and training.

Learn more about Mr. Kovach here.

Amanda K. Brady, Managing Director/Chief Client Officer, conducted and completed this search.

Business professionals in starting positions on a running track, symbolizing competition and hustle culture in the workplace.

“Do the hustle.” Three of only six total words sung repeatedly by Van McCoy and the Soul City Symphony. I wonder if this is what McCoy had in mind, this “hustle culture” that’s become so commonplace in the workforce? It’s a hot-button topic. So hot, in fact, that an anti-hustle movement has developed, appropriately dubbed the #antiwork movement

Where do you and your employees fall on the anti-work-to-hustle culture scale? To answer that, we first have to define hustle culture. We can then address the pros and cons of such a culture and highlight what some organizations are doing to find the right balance.

What Is Hustle Culture?

At its core, hustle culture—meaning ‘all about constantly working’—reflects an unrelenting push for productivity. It may not be new, but the hustle culture meaning has become more prevalent in recent years. The executive lifestyle goes beyond working hard, beyond long hours for a major deadline, and beyond moving up the corporate ladder. It’s an all-consuming obsession with productivity that impacts our quality of life and our quality of work. With hustle culture, there is no such thing as a work-life balance. A study conducted by the Harvard Business Review tracking how large companies’ CEOs spend their time found that 79% of those leaders conducted business on weekend days and up to 70% of vacation days.

We don’t realize that hustle culture is typically not demonized but celebrated. Examples of hustle culture in the workplace include shoutouts in morning huddles for the project manager who worked 30 days straight to meet a deadline or the supervisor answering emails while on vacation. What’s more, employees – myself included – are proud participants.

When Did Hustle Culture Start?

Hustle culture’s roots go back to the Industrial Revolution when long hours and relentless productivity were celebrated. So, as work shifted from farms to factories, society’s values around hard work began to reshape, setting the foundation for a culture that equates long hours with commitment and success. Fast forward to the 1980s and 90s, when phrases like “work hard, play hard” became popular among corporate professionals, and high-profile CEOs started glamorizing the “always on” lifestyle.

With the rise of social media, hustle culture became more prevalent as influencers, entrepreneurs, and self-help gurus championed the idea of grinding non-stop to achieve personal and professional success. Platforms like Instagram and LinkedIn are filled with images and quotes glorifying late nights and early mornings, feeding the notion that a packed schedule is a badge of honor. Today, hustle culture has permeated nearly every industry, with many professionals feeling constant pressure to be productive, even at the expense of their health and well-being.

Why We Love the Hustle

The hustle gets you places. From a young age, we are taught that hard work and dedication are the cornerstones of success. Do you want better grades? Hit the books. Do you want to be a better athlete? Practice, practice, practice. And you know what? It pays off. You ace the test, make the team, get the job, land the promotion. The most challenging part is differentiating where the natural hustle and hard work ends, and the toxic work obsession begins.

The benefits of participating in and fostering a hustle culture can yield greater output, better sales, more clients, higher revenue – everything that can make an organization successful. 

Why Grind Culture is Toxic

So why bother stopping the hustle? In short, wellness. The timing of this blog following our Wellness in the Workplace series is strategic. Hustle culture is another culprit that negatively impacts employee well-being. Hustle culture impacts mental health because our work addiction can trigger burnout, chronic stress, depression, and anxiety, creating a cycle of exhaustion that wears down mental resilience.

And hustle culture impacts physical health because the physical toll of constant overwork includes risks like cardiovascular disease, with Corporate Wellness Magazine telling us executives are at even higher risk due to the constant need to always be “on.” According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, an overworked and stressed employee can be up to 68% less productive despite putting in more effort and hours. Additionally, Corporate Wellness Magazine notes that executives frequently absorb the largest amount of stress, potentially leading to chronic health conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, and hormone imbalances.

How To Counteract Hustle Culture in the Workplace

The easy part is done. We know what needs to change. But where do we go from here? Before we can even begin moving toward potential solutions that would squash our corporate hustle culture, we have to have buy-in from leadership as much as from individuals. Starting with a common goal is step one. Commitment to that goal is step two. Steps three and beyond will look different for everyone and remain fluid as we develop as individuals and organizations.

In a recent article for Inc., Dmitri Lepikhov, CEO of Mightcall, addresses the question, How can employers avoid creating a hustle culture in their workplace? He outlines three actionable steps to help reduce grind culture and foster a healthier work environment.

Corporate Wellness Magazine explains how some corporate boards of directors are taking matters into their own hands, and investing in their executives’ health and wellness. They go above and beyond their standard health insurance to include preventative exams, health action plans, and follow-up care. In many cases, executives remain loyal to their company because of the health benefits they receive. These highly intelligent people understand that their company is investing in them and their families by investing in their health.

Redefining Success: Balancing Hustle Culture with Wellness

Despite its evolution, the impact of hustle culture remains the same: an unrelenting pace that blurs the lines between work and personal life, affecting our health, productivity, and overall quality of life. Understanding where this culture originated and how it became ingrained in our professional lives is the first step toward reassessing its value and finding a healthier approach to success.

But what does hustle culture mean for your organization and your team? Are you promoting a balanced, sustainable approach to work, or are you caught in a cycle of constant hustle? Redefining success in your workplace starts with assessing current practices and opening conversations about work-life balance. Encourage your team to set realistic boundaries and prioritize wellness without sacrificing their professional goals.

Take the first step toward balance: speak with your leadership team, consider implementing wellness programs, and lead by example. Building a work culture that values both achievement and well-being is possible—and it’s key to creating a healthier, more effective workforce.

Explore more leadership strategies with The Alexander Group.

Corporate board recruitment strategies for aspiring board members.

The Alexander Group provides insights on corporate board recruitment and how to attain a board seat. This guide will help executives take strategic steps to secure a board position, drawing on expertise from our experience in executive search and corporate governance.

How To Attain a C-Suite Board Position

One of the most frequently asked questions we get about C-level board recruitment is, “How do I get on a corporate board if I’m not already on a board?” The hardest board will be your first board.

Here is what you need to know.

1) C-Level Board Placement Is Different Than Applying for a Full-Time Position

A board seat is usually not a position for which you apply. It is much more like a sorority, fraternity, or even a posh club: Candidacy is by invitation only. While visiting and making contacts with search firms is helpful, it should not be your only strategy. Search firms fill only a relatively small percentage of board seats, though this number is increasing due to the need for highly specialized talents and a commitment to greater diversity.

Because someone can work and still serve on a board, it’s relatively easy for board members to recruit friends, former colleagues, or executives with whom they’ve done business. A search firm may not be as helpful to you in seeking a board position as it would be if you were looking for a C-suite role simply because board searches are not put out to search nearly as often as executive positions are.

Secondly, board positions do not have as much turnover as C-suite roles. The average tenure for directors in the larger companies of the S&P 500 Index and the broader Russell 3000 index is nearly ten years.

Lastly, it is expensive. Search firms charge anywhere from $70,000 to $200,000 to complete board searches. Many Boards inquire about their network before retaining executive board search services.

2) Know Thy Strengths

What value could you bring to a board? Determine the industry and type of company where your background would be an asset. Would you meet the requirements to serve on a company’s Audit Committee? Do you have a background in a sought-after functional area, such as compliance, data security, or executive compensation? Are you a diversity candidate? There are many functional areas or qualifications that boards seek to ensure they have a well-rounded board.

Prepare an “elevator” speech that you will use to introduce your candidacy to executive board search services and sources of referrals for board positions that articulate what you have to offer. You will also need a different resume highlighting your value to a board, your ability to represent shareholders and interactions with your own or other boards.

3) Define Your Brand

What would someone learn about you if they Googled your name? Does your resume reinforce the assets you would bring to a board? (Define your strengths; see number 2 above). Who are you, and how have you established yourself? What is your reputation? What enterprise challenges have you faced and successfully navigated?

4) Be Visible

It is not enough that you are good at what you do. Being selected for a board requires both an internal and external effort. This requirement is especially important if you are not currently working. One of the fastest ways to disqualify yourself from a board is not to be “current.” Today, board members must be up to date with changes in business and technology. To this end, it is critical to become versed in social media. Have a LinkedIn profile complete with a picture. Have an account with—and understand how to use—Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok (even if you don’t use it). Submit articles, blogs, or comments to industry association websites and publications. Engage in online dialog with your peers on social media. Publish an article on LinkedIn that delves into your area of expertise.

5) Obtaining a Board Position is All About Contacts and Networking

Landing a board seat is both a numbers game and a contacts game. Let your investment banking, law, bank, public accounting, and consulting firm contacts know of your interest in being on a board and the value you would bring. Use LinkedIn to identify board members of companies whom you can contact. Note if any of the directors are close to retirement. Many individuals have found board positions by contacting venture capital firms. In addition to search firms, check out top registries such as the National Association of Corporate Directors, Catalyst (for women), and various universities that have board training programs. Stanford, Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management, and Dartmouth offer corporate governance programs.

6) Start Small and Leverage Those Successes

Be willing to start small. Are there any not-for-profits for which you have a passion? If so, volunteer to be on their board, even locally. Are there small companies that are looking for a volunteer board? What about your church, child’s school, or trade association? Once you’re on an organization’s board, fellow board members are often senior executives from public companies with whom you can network. It may take two or three not-for-profit boards before you can join a for-profit board. We know several executives who got their start on public boards by working with emerging growth companies and rode with those companies as they went from a garage operation to a Fortune 1000 company.

Most executives agree that it is harder to land their first board position than actually to serve on a board. Look at your contacts and networking as investing in one board and future Board positions. Not surprisingly, most search firms who conduct board searches look first to those already serving on public boards.

C-Suite Board Recruitment Specialists

Remember, landing a board seat takes dedication, strategic positioning, and consistent networking efforts. When you understand the intricacies of corporate board recruitment, refining your personal brand, and making yourself visible within relevant circles, you will increase your chances of attaining that coveted position. Remember, the journey to your first board seat is often the hardest, but the relationships you foster and the expertise you build along the way are invaluable assets. 

The Alexander Group remains committed to guiding ambitious executives through every step of corporate board recruitment, leveraging our experience to ensure that leaders find roles where they can truly make an impact.

Additional resources:

The Executive Leadership Council: Helps provide opportunities for African American executives.The Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility: Serves as a resource for Hispanic executives vying for board service.

Anyone who has ever been involved with a not-for-profit will at some point be asked to serve on a search committee or lead a search committee’s search for a new CEO/President or senior officer. We have written previously about the responsibilities of search committee members and how candidates can prepare for a search committee interview but wanted to take a deeper look at the role of the Search Committee Chair.

We turn to Steve Taylor, a leader in the not-for-profit community for nearly 30 years who is currently serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Mission Officer of the Arthritis Foundation. Steve recently chaired the search committee for the President and CEO of the National Health Council, which has been widely viewed as a well-run search with outstanding results. Below, Steve answers the questions we are frequently asked as not-for-profit recruits using search committees.

How big should a search committee be?

I believe the ideal size is seven, including the Chairman who should also have a vote. You could possibly do nine or five, but frankly, if the Committee becomes too large, it can be hard to coordinate schedules. You have too many opinions in the discussions, and you want every voice to be heard. You’ll also want to make sure it’s an odd number; that way there is no tie.

Who should be on a search committee?

Much of it depends on the position. Ideally, one to three members of the Executive Committee should be on the Search Committee and supplement that with volunteers who represent different parts of the organization. I recommend looking at the various responsibilities of the position you are trying to fill. Which volunteers can best represent and understand these responsibilities? The key to a successful search committee is that you want members with perspective but who are not living in the past. On the other hand, you don’t want search committee members being so free-spirited they are substituting their vision for that of the Board’s.

The ideal Search Committee member understands the history of the organization as well as its future vision.

And that is what is so important when selecting volunteers to serve on a search committee: they need to be familiar [with] and embrace the Board’s vision for the organization and also represent different constituencies of the organization.

Should current employees sit on a search committee?

Many organizations wrestle with this question. Sometimes, it makes sense, especially when you have long-term employees who understand the organization. But this is not a choice without challenges.

If there are internal candidates for the position, it can be difficult to ask a colleague [to] make an unbiased choice.


Secondly, a staff member on the Committee may not have the strategic view of the organization that a high-ranking volunteer or board member will have.
Thirdly, it can be sensitive for an employee to be involved in salary discussions involving the successful candidate.


I typically recommend that one of the Search Committee members serve as a liaison to a group of employees/staff. On the search I led for the National Health Council, I personally maintained contact with the senior leadership team. While I did not discuss individual candidates, I asked the search firm to solicit their opinions on the type of leaders we were seeking, and I communicated to them on the progress of the search.

Who selects the search firm, and what should be considered?

I can’t overemphasize the importance of a strong partnership with the search firm. You want it to be a partnership, not just a firm presenting resumes. The Chair should have meaningful input on selecting the search firm because they’ll be the one working [most] closely with them. Of course, the Search Committee reviews proposals and meets with several finalists. Ultimately, the Chair of the Search Committee should have a strong voice when selecting a search firm.

For me, the search firm needed to have experience in organizing and administratively providing infrastructure to the committee so that I and the Committee could focus on the candidates.

I also believe the Chair shouldn’t rely on the Search Committee or search firm to coordinate. There will be times that the Chair needs to jump in to either facilitate meetings or deal with scheduling or personnel challenges. The search firm should be willing to do more than just conduct the search as many members of a search committee have full-time jobs.

I advise my colleagues running search committees to be very specific with what you would like the search firm to do.

Do you want them to:

-Attend search committee meetings?
-Set the agenda for search committee meetings?
-Provide interview questions?


I believe you need a search firm to do anything the Search Committee and its Chairman cannot or do not want to do because of time restraints.

It is a given that a search firm needs to have a robust Rolodex, but I’m still trying to figure out how to evaluate that. [laughing] What you can evaluate is recent searches a search firm has conducted for similar positions. As we evaluated search firms, some listed searches conducted over a decade ago! That was a lifetime ago in the not-for-profit world.

Finally, I believe you need to find a search firm that is upfront and honest with you about who the lead staff will be—and that you have the opportunity to meet with that lead staff to ensure compatibility and understanding of the process you envision—before you finalize your selection on a firm.

What allowances did you make during COVID-19 in the most recent search you chaired?

Overall, it worked out well. In certain ways, the process moved more efficiently given the Search Committee met by Zoom and the candidates were interviewed by the search firm and us for first-round interviews by Zoom. One advantage we had as a search committee is that we all knew each other—some better than others—but this familiarity allowed us to work together well virtually.

Once we narrowed the process to our finalists, we asked them to meet face to face, of course, social distancing, wearing masks, etc., with another search committee member and me. Despite adapting to video conferencing, meeting the candidate in person makes a big difference. To have a candidate willing to invest the time to travel to a meeting and meet a group of people, some in person, some virtually, was critical to the final steps of our process.

We were able to observe how they handled themselves in the middle of a pandemic, watch how they coordinated their presentation, and even how they arranged the papers on the conference table. In a virtual interview, you have no idea if the candidate has sticky notes on their computer screen providing possible hints to questions. That was important to us because that’s what the job is going to be (ultimately): face-to-face meetings working with different constituencies and being able to communicate and think on their feet. Interestingly, I believe we would have ended up with the same candidate if we had searched COVID.

As a search committee chair, how do you handle candidate withdrawals and surprises?

As a search committee chair or member, you understand that many candidates are currently in good positions, and you are hoping to attract them to your organization. You can’t get too nervous about that. It is part of the process. You reach for candidates; some attract, and some lose. And if a candidate pulls out, I believe they should do it in the search process rather than later.

As for the second part of your question, as Chair, you have to be flexible, responsive, and nimble because issues arise that need to be acted on quickly. Several times, I had to reach out to Committee members individually to keep the process moving either because an issue arose on a Friday night or there was simply not the time to call a full committee meeting. You establish that at the beginning of the search, so there is no misunderstanding. In every search, there may be small decisions made either by the chair or by a smaller group on the committee, because trying to get everyone together all the time isn’t possible, but ultimately the big decisions are made as a group.

How much time does it take to do a good job?

The time required ebbs and flows during the search. If you have a good search firm, as we did in using The Alexander Group, there’s less time initially because you allow them to do the search and trust their judgment on the candidates they’re presenting. The search committee chair is free to focus on the higher-level items most important to finding the right candidate. Once the interview process is underway, you must be available for the search committee, search firm, [and] staff as the process unfolds. There is a significant time commitment required for the Chair. The organization needs someone who can make that time commitment because you’ll never finish the search if it is not a priority.

Who should be the Chair?

Choosing the right search committee chair is critical to a successful search. The chair needs to be a leader in the organization who understands its past and its future vision. It does not have to be the current board chair. It could be a past board chair that might have more time because it’s not the current board chair. It is important the chair can lead without supervision and is trusted by the board.