This is another entry in our series covering advice for first-time board members, though we continue to receive emails on additional advice for new board members. One of our readers suggested that you think of your first board as if you are being introduced to your spouses-to-be’s family. Maybe that is not the perfect analogy, but first impressions are hard to counterbalance should you make a mistake. If you have missed our previous posts, you can check them out here and here.

As a board director, how you communicate is just as important as what you do. Successful directors think before they speak and influence their peers instead of making demands. Continue reading for more expert advice on effectively communicating as a board director.

Question in the right way.

Think before you speak. Ask yourself: What is my intent? What is my objective? One savvy director says he phrases his questions to promote discussion and allow the board to examine the issue more deeply.

You need not always ask the first question or make the first comment on a topic. There will be times when you can offer more by listening first to what others have to say. As we noted in our last blog, refrain from asking questions merely to get information that you should already have; in other words, do your homework so you don’t have to use meeting time to get up to speed. If you have unanswered questions, schedule one-on-one calls or meetings with the CEO or other directors before the meeting and during breaks.

Be time-conscious and make every moment count.

Know what matters and what does not because time is limited. One veteran director comments, “There is always a director who wants to monopolize the conversation and listen to himself talk. Don’t be that person.”

Stick to the topics that require the board’s attention and action. If the conversation derails, gently guide everyone back to the topic. Details matter and often merit discussion, but avoid “the weeds” unless the issue is the weeds. Those are better left to management.

Be open to adapting your communication style.

You will have a different kind of authority than a director on your first public board as a CEO, where you have the final say. A board meeting is not a staff meeting where you make unilateral decisions and assign tasks. One director, a managing partner at a private equity firm, confessed that after being on the board of portfolio companies where he didn’t have to share power with others, joining a public board required him to modify his style to stop giving orders and rely more on influence.

Because boards act collectively and not individually, effective directors must act through persuasion, convincing others of the merits—and the risks—of a particular decision. Becoming an influential board member requires understanding how other directors receive and process information. You will never finish refining your ability to influence.

Be careful about how you discuss previous experience.

Use your experience as an executive officer at other companies without constantly referring to it. As one director said, “It is very annoying for someone to continually say, ‘At ABC company, we always did this.’” Constantly bringing up your experience as an executive may turn off management and your fellow directors.

Instead, one veteran director suggests asking open-ended questions that compare strategies. “Could there be a better way to do this?” works much better than “At my company, we do it differently.”

Ask for feedback.

Director communication should be on a two-way street, not limited to the boardroom or committee room. Most boards have a formal director evaluation process; let that assessment be an ongoing process and seek out the views of other directors on a range of relevant matters. One of the most valuable things a new director can do is ask for feedback on their board participation after the first or second meeting. If you are talking too much, focusing on the wrong issues, or crossing the line on management responsibilities, learning it quickly to adapt is better.

Provide feedback—but do it respectfully.

After you have gained experience serving on the board, be a helpful leader to any new directors. An experienced board director suggests providing positive feedback to new board members by starting with positive recognition: “I like the way you did this. However, when you said that, you turned the management off. Is there a better way you could approach that?” Many first-time board directors may be insecure initially; the seasoned director has an opportunity to mentor and guide the new director to be effective.

A businessman is trapped in his glass office by a surplus of discarded ideas on paper . His colleague in the next office is working more efficiently and is oblivious to him being trapped .

What do you do when you have hired someone who, once on board, is not a good hire? No one intends to make bad hiring decisions, but they happen for various reasons. Think Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde.

We interviewed several leaders; interestingly, most offered the same advice: You will know if you have made a bad hire within three to six months—and sometimes much sooner, they agreed. Their recommendation? “Face the music and move on. Do not sit tight and hope that it will get better. Fault generally lies on both sides.”

“Nobody wants to fire anybody,” says Jeff Early, a 40-year banking veteran, “but it’s fairer for both the employee and the employer to resolve the problem quickly.”

Cut your Losses

Dan Bowling, Senior Lecturing Fellow at Duke Law School and former head of human resources for Coca-Cola Enterprises, responded typical of the group: “Cut your losses as soon as you can. In my experience, once you begin to have serious doubts, it is hard to reverse them. Your instincts are probably right.”

One executive we spoke to had hired a Vice President of Compensation, a generalist who emphasized compensation. The individual convinced the hiring manager that she could handle a compensation role and interviewed well with key stakeholders. She “Seemed like a good fit. References checked—she had tons of promise.” The hiring manager and candidate both acknowledged there would be a learning curve and that it would take some time to get her up to speed.

However, it quickly became apparent that she needed help to handle the stress of a new environment and the demands of improving her technical skills. Her mistakes added to her stress; she stopped sleeping, which compounded her ability to assess new information, and before long, it was clear that she could not manage the job. The hiring manager openly discussed with the individual how they both decided without having all the facts, and she was released with a two-week notice. “We hired one of the other candidates in the search, and it worked out well in the long run.”

Others could have been more successful.

One executive tells a grim tale of getting stuck with a bad hire: “A typical issue one faces is when a senior person is hired with the involvement of other departmental heads. You know a mistake has been made within the first few weeks—you see it daily. The executive might be satisfying the needs and agendas of those other constituencies but can’t do the job you need doing.”

Undoing a hiring mistake quickly can be difficult in a modern corporate environment because of the multiple constituencies involved in a key executive’s recruitment and selection process. Sometimes, Bismarck’s diplomatic skills are needed to convince the rest of the management team that a mistake was made.

“It took two years to manage his exit,” our executive added. “By then, the damage was done.”

Coaching

In the collective experience of the executives we surveyed, a company has rarely been able to reverse a hiring mistake. When it does happen, it is a magical synergy of the particular individual, their situation, and the complexity of the role.

Some respondents maintain that coaching the individual can sometimes save the hire. 360-degree assessments are highly effective tools for obtaining concrete feedback from others and addressing performance issues.

One executive told us: “Clearly communicate expectations and needed areas of improvement, define key measurable metrics to achieve performance objectives, document all activity and ongoing progress, and genuinely work with the individual to help them embrace the role and deliver desired results.”

Other times when coaching can save the hire are when circumstances change beyond the individual’s control. For example, a person may be assigned a new manager, a new CEO may have a different strategic vision, or the company may be sold or make an acquisition, and suddenly, the newly hired executive may not be a fit.

One executive recalled hiring a Vice President of Human Resources who was a superb cultural and technical fit. However, six months after he joined, the company acquired another company with extensive international operations. The new Vice President of Human Resources had yet to gain international experience and would not have been qualified for his role in the now-global company. The company and the individual used coaching, added support, and training to allow the individual to keep and excel in his expanded role.

However, if the issues are exclusively about style or cultural match, coaching someone to fit into the organization is harder.

Move the Person into Another Role

Carved into another moved function or position that might provide a better fit? Our surveyed executives agreed that this works on occasion. For example, suppose there is a personality conflict with the hiring manager, but there is a comparable role in another region or business unit. In that case, it is possible to transition the person successfully. However, “there are not many second chances in most companies,” one executive cautioned us.

Mr. Bowling added his caution: “Another position in the organization might be a better fit, so make a good faith effort to look for one. But don’t transfer your problems to someone else—that is unethical and will destroy your credibility in the long run.”

Learn from Your Mistakes

What was your mistake? Was it hiring too fast? Ignoring red flags because you personally liked the individual? Being so wooed by a track record that you ignored cultural fit? Do you need more adequate due diligence?

Most of our respondents agreed that many of their hiring mistakes proved an opportunity to re-examine their hiring process. And yes, you need a structured hiring process that defines what you seek, aligns the interview team, includes behavior-based interviewing, and ensures due diligence.

“I once had a boss who said, be slow to hire, quick to fire,” adds Mr. Early. “That’s trite, but, looking back, I should’ve heeded that more often.”

Realize also that a batting average of 100 percent on new hires is unrealistic and shouldn’t be expected. Jack Welch, former Chief Executive Officer of General Electric, said, “New managers are lucky to get it right half the time. And even executives with decades of experience will tell you they make the right calls 75 percent of the time, at best.”

And when you do make those mistakes, don’t be afraid to admit them. Just try not to repeat them.

This article was initially published in November 2011 and updated in September 2018.