Wendela von Munching has joined Clifford Chance as Chief People Officer.
Ms. von Munching has more than 25 years of strategic and operational human resources leadership experience with major multinational firms. Previously, she served as the worldwide Chief People Officer for Freshfields.
Learn more about Ms. von Munching here.
Managing Director John Lamar, Director William Lepiesza, and Senior Associate Anthony Ott conducted and completed this search.
Historically, the CIO role in law firms has required an innovative strategist with an ironclad technology background to drive success. However, as law firms and client needs continue to evolve in the wake of artificial intelligence and client needs and expectations, so does the legal CIO role.
A 2023 survey conducted by CIO Magazine reported that 47 percent of technology executives said security management and improving IT operations and systems performance were their top two responsibilities. Tasks such as business innovation, identifying competitive differentiation opportunities and business strategy were at the low end of the to-do list.
Fast-forward two years, and CIO feedback is changing along with expectations. CIO Magazine reports that the same technology leaders see driving business innovation as a top priority.
The surveyed CIOs said increased levels of business-focused strategic responsibilities will become part of their daily agenda, with technological emphasis being handed to other tech professionals within the firm.
It’s a sentiment echoed by The Alexander Group’s coterie of managing directors and directors, who have conducted dozens of CIO searches for law firm clients over the past four decades. We know the specific needs of law firm clients seeking forward-thinking CIOs who cover the tech infrastructure and bring leadership, communication, and innovative thinking to the table.
What will the expanded role of the law firm CIO look like in 2025, 2026, and beyond? Our team weighs in on this evolving role’s position requirements and responsibilities.
As the CIO role in law firms expands, so does the skill set required to excel. Today’s legal CIOs are expected to be more than just tech-savvy—they are strategic leaders, collaborators, and innovators. Here, The Alexander Group’s seasoned managing directors and directors share their perspectives on the essential qualities and evolving responsibilities that today’s top law firm CIOs must bring to the table.
“Today’s CIO possesses a combination of technical expertise and strategic leadership. They have become client-facing and seek ways to enhance the client and lawyer/employeeexperience.
Clients and lawyers are demanding innovative and cost-efficient technology solutions. Artificial Intelligence continues to dominate potential technology solutions, and although it’s in its infancy, it will certainly increase and automate various billable activities. However, it poses many challenges around ethics, security, and compliance.”
John Lamar, Managing Director, The Alexander Group
“Just as law firm marketing has evolved into strategic business development, so has information technology. Now, stemming from IT roots, you will find chief innovation officers, chief security/data security officers, and chief knowledge management officers roles. All of these require an understanding of technology, both firm-side and that of their clients.
That said, IT infrastructure and support are table stakes. The CIO role and these newer, evolved roles begin with understanding business and client relationships, actively collaborating with clients, and finding ways to make those client relationships sticky.”
Amanda Brady, Managing Director/Chief Client Officer, The Alexander Group
“In the past, CIOs were primarily concerned with the network and infrastructure side of technology, but that has changed considerably. Many firms now understand the applications, various databases, and ease of use by all constituents is a much more valuable set of skills.
The amount of data collected by law firms is huge, and this, coupled with cross-level cyber security and AI, means that a top-flight CIO has to have extraordinary technical skills and understand what solutions may help lawyers in the practice of law and business professionals run the operations of the firm.
The entire landscape is considerably more complex. An effective CIO must also be a strong teammate to other chiefs and an excellent manager of people who are perhaps not as blessed with good communication skills.”
Sally King, Managing Director, The Alexander Group
“The CIO role has been in the spotlight recently–from mitigating increased cyber-security threats and addressing client-driven information security requirements to shepherding and leading the migration to robust and reliable remote-work capabilities; to evaluating and deploying next-generation AI tools and pilot programs. And as a result, the level of institutional change management, business acumen, and firmwide strategic leadership skills have become equally important as technical expertise and operational know-how for top-tier CIOS.”
William Lepiesza, Director, The Alexander Group
“Law firms are increasingly hiring new CIOs. Historically, the IT function has been a critical operational function for law firms. The increasing demands on the technology function to be a driver of the business, as opposed to a supporter of the business, has led to a need for more business-savvy, forward-looking, strategic CIOs.
The job description has evolved from infrastructure, software, and support aspects of the CIO role to a much greater emphasis on information security and technology innovation (including, but certainly not limited to, AI).
Many of our law firm clients have created separate, peer-level Chief Information Security Officer and Chief Innovation Officer roles to elevate those functions and work arm-in-arm with the more traditional CIO.”
Sarah Mitchell, Director, The Alexander Group
The law firm CIO role is evolving to become a top-to-bottom position emphasizing strong internal and external communication skills and the ability to be nimble in all aspects of the role. The CIO is a vital element of firm administrative leadership and will have the opportunity to contribute to a firm’s future in ways not previously imagined or expected.
Progress and innovation lie at the heart of technology, making this time in the CIO life cycle more dynamic and challenging than ever before and setting the stage for what’s next.
Visit our website for C-suite recruitment services tailored to law firm leadership and navigating the evolving CIO role in law firms.
Board member resignation—especially mass resignation—can destabilize a company, affect investor confidence, and disrupt shareholder relations. Understanding how to navigate these crises is essential for leaders, stakeholders, and aspiring board members.
News Item: All seven independent directors of 23andMe’s (NASDAQ: ME) eight-person board resigned en masse, leaving CEO Anne Wojcicki, co-founder, as its only director. Ms. Wojcicki reportedly owns more than 20% of 23andMe’s common stock and 49% of its voting rights. In their resignation letter, the independent directors said after working for months after Ms. Wojcicki announced her desire to take the company private, they had yet to receive a proposal from Ms. Wojcicki that was in the best interests of the non-affiliated shareholders.
Over the years, we’ve dedicated quite a bit of our blog real estate to board searches:
This article builds on that foundation to examine the recent 23andMe resignation and other examples of board upheaval. We’ll explore the role of corporate governance in managing these crises and provide actionable strategies to rebuild trust and stability after boardroom challenges.
A corporate governance system is the framework of rules, practices, and processes by which a company is directed and controlled. The corporate governance definition broadly encompasses the mechanisms through which an organization balances the interests of its various stakeholders, including shareholders, management, customers, suppliers, financiers, government, and the community. At its core, corporate governance ensures that a company operates in a way that is ethical, accountable, and transparent while striving to achieve its strategic objectives.
Effective corporate governance is essential for maintaining investor confidence, improving investor relations, reducing risks, and ensuring sustainable business practices. It often encompasses key elements such as board composition, leadership structures, decision-making processes, and shareholder rights.
By establishing clear guidelines and oversight mechanisms, corporate governance helps organizations like 23andMe and others navigate complex business challenges, align management strategies with shareholder interests, and foster long-term success.
When a mass board of directors resignation occurs, it often raises significant questions about governance, strategy, and accountability. As seen with 23andMe, such resignations typically follow disputes over leadership direction, shareholder interests, or internal communication. In these cases, the resignation letter from the board can provide critical insights into the root causes, whether they stem from dissatisfaction with the CEO, strategic disagreements, or broader governance issues.
Mass resignations can leave organizations vulnerable, requiring rapid responses to rebuild governance structures and maintain stakeholder confidence. This underscores the importance of proactive governance practices, clear communication, and a robust succession plan for board leadership.
After the news of the independent 23andMe directors resigning en masse, we knew another board-related article was in order.
The shareholders elect directors to represent them and play a pivotal role in maintaining strong shareholder relations through fiduciary responsibility and transparent communication. They owe shareholders a fiduciary duty of care (act in good faith, exercise reasonable business judgment, and effectively serve as the direct report of the Chief Executive Officer). Collectively, a board should work together cooperatively, collaboratively, and effectively to act in the best interest of the shareholders. When a corporation retains The Alexander Group to conduct a board search, we meet with the board or nominating and governance committees to discuss the experience and chemistry–both essential to being an effective board member.
In our years of conducting board searches, we have only been asked to replace an entire board once. For context, it was a wholly owned publicly traded subsidiary of the fabled Enron failure and took place in 2001. It’s fair to say this is a rare occurrence.
In the case of the 23andMe board resignation, the seven directors who stepped down in September 2024 said in a letter they had yet to receive “a fully financed, fully diligenced, actionable proposal that is in the best interests of the non-affiliated shareholders” from the chief executive after months of efforts.
Wojcicki responded to the resignations in a memo to employees, published in a securities filing, saying she was “surprised and disappointed” by the directors’ decision.
The genetics testing company went public in 2021 and reported a net loss of $667 million for its last fiscal year, more than double the loss of $312 million for the year prior.
A less high-profile but still stunning board of directors resignation preceded the 23andMe news in May 2024, when Gildan Activewear (NYSE:GIL) CEO Vince Tyra and the entire Board of Directors stepped down after three months in his role. Gildan is a leading manufacturer of everyday basic apparel, including activewear, underwear, and socks.
In the press release, the outgoing board said Browning West, an activist investor group, had secured replacements for the Board of Directors, effective immediately.
While Gildan had a backup board plan in place, as of October 2024, 23andMe’s Wojcicki is still the only board member. However, the company said, “We will immediately begin identifying independent directors to join the board.”
In truth, total board attrition is rare, but when something seismic occurs within the corporate board space, it’s worth considering the why—and the what’s next.
Matthew Scott, an editor at Chief Executive Magazine, offers the following suggestions to the now-defunct 23andMe board and other directors looking to maintain a healthy board.
The strategies of 23andme’s board and executive team over the last five years were ineffective, yet the two sides watched the stock price drop without making significant changes to stop the decline. This suggests a lack of urgency to correct the problems causing the poor performance, a lack of cooperation to address key issues as the stock price continued declining, or agreement on a series of failed strategies. Boards and CEOs must show greater urgency to preserve value for shareholders than seems to have been exhibited here.
How does a company’s stock price continuously decline, but the board and CEO don’t have substantive conversations about solutions? If the board and CEO are communicating transparently and effectively, especially in times of crisis or declining revenues/income, they are putting the company at risk. Board oversight includes recognizing when communication between the board and management is inadequate and immediately addressing it. Boards must insist on clear and effective communication between the board and management team to maximize their efforts to improve shareholder value.
According to the letter the independent directors sent CEO Wojcicki, her proposal stated that she would “oppose any alternative transaction” to taking the company private under the terms she proposed. Once the directors realized that the CEO and her affiliates had voting power to overrule the independent directors’ efforts to “fully assess whether there is interest from third parties,” they resigned. Sometimes, directors may have to reconsider how effective they can be at oversight when there is a majority shareholder. Virtually every executive who joins a board does so, expecting to have an impact. If board members can’t have an impact, they may find it easier to leave, individually or all together.
When looking beyond the headlines, it’s important to remember that 23andMe is a cautionary tale in several respects.
When a company goes public, raises a massive amount of capital, and is led by a former hedge fund executive, it generates lots of buzz. Despite the heady start, the company’s future is in doubt partially because of differences with the Board and the Board’s inability to prevail over a controlling shareholder.
There are lessons and questions here for both CEOs and board members. Those joining the board of a private or public company with a controlling shareholder should assess how the shareholder will work with the board. Can they challenge the CEO or the controlling shareholder? How will they negotiate conflict? Who are the other directors, and why are they on the board?
It’s better to ask questions, even the difficult ones, early on than to be left with an empty boardroom and no plan for the future.
For more information, visit The Alexander Group’s blog: The Loop.
Jason Hill has been named Chief Marketing Officer for White & Case LLP.
Mr. Hill has extensive, strategic, and transformative business development and marketing leadership experience. He joins White & Case from Goldman Sachs, where he served as Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer for Global Marketing.
Learn more about Mr. Hill here.
This search was conducted and completed by Managing Director John Lamar, Director William Lepiesza and Associate Pam DeLuca.
Truda Chow has been named Chief Operating Officer by Frost Brown Todd LLP.
Ms. Chow has extensive experience serving in highly impactful law firm leadership roles, and before joining Frost Brown Todd, she served as Chief Operating Officer for North America for Clyde & Co. and as firmwide Chief Operating Officer for Michael Best.
For more information about Ms. Chow, click here.
This search was conducted and completed by John Lamar and William Lepiesza.
What do Walmart, Berkshire Hathaway, Dell, Comcast, Publix, and Ford have in common? All are among the nation’s largest companies and members of the Fortune 100. Each of them is “family-owned,” which is loosely defined as having two or more family members involved and a majority of ownership or control within the family. Family-owned businesses date back centuries to family farms and, in urban settings, shops, and businesses where the family lived above the premises. In both examples, all family members actively participated in producing the family’s livelihood.
Although many people think of family-owned businesses as making up only a small part of the economy, the following 2021 statistics from Family Business reveal that family-owned businesses:
Employ 23 percent of the US workforce, accounting for 32.6 million jobs;
Generating 23 percent of private-sector GDP or $3.2 trillion; and
Total 9.1 million businesses, representing 25 percent of all business tax returns.
Pressure to Keep it in The Family—Challenges in Hiring Family Members:
The family-business owner, like all business owners, should be concerned about having the best talent in appropriate roles. This can pose a challenge when hiring family members for key positions. Are they the best qualified? It is important to establish hiring and position requirements and uniformly adhere to them when considering family. These guidelines help avoid the pressure to hire a family member only because they are a family member. Many family companies encourage the next generation of family interested in the business to work for another company for several years to gain general business knowledge and experience to be eligible to join the family business.
When family members choose to work for another company in the same industry, they gain added perspective and familiarity with accepted industry-specific best practices. Family members who work outside the family business can gain increased credibility with other family members and the board. Family businesses should communicate hiring criteria for all positions, which not only sets the standard for talent management but can avoid future misunderstandings and conflicts.
The family business owner should ensure that every employee, whether a family member or not, receives the training needed to allow them to function successfully. Placing a family member in a role for which they lack the appropriate skills without a plan to provide the needed training can cause tension, low morale, and family drama. Family member executives must be assessed on their own merits. Each position should have yearly goals so that the family member can be evaluated objectively and without favoritism.
Strategically Hiring Outside The Family:
Hiring nonfamily members, especially doing so for the first time, can be challenging. Many companies decide to hire nonfamily members when the owners want to accelerate the company’s growth. Other companies hire nonfamily members when the company needs specific skills such as legal, international, or financial expertise. The challenge then becomes ensuring that the nonfamily member is a good fit with the organization’s culture and the family itself, especially if the company is small. Marc Sharpe, Chairman of the Family Office Association, reports that individuals who are comfortable with a “servant leadership style” in which one leads by putting the needs of their team first can be an excellent personality fit for a family business.
He adds that while hiring a nonfamily manager is often done to acquire a specific skill set, it is also important to hire individuals who have the flexibility to take on a generalist role when needed. If companies are recruiting nonfamily members for a position to replace a family member, it is important to communicate the reason for the hire and have detailed position requirements. If the company’s management are not in full agreement to hire a nonfamily executive, it will be a difficult and possibly unsuccessful hire.
To avoid and resolve family conflict, it is important in the recruitment and retention of outside candidates to ensure the family business has well-defined business procedures and corporate governance. Also, making decisions informally outside the office will put the nonfamily member at a disadvantage.
Best Practices for Executives Joining a Family Business:
Individuals who work for family businesses agree that it can either be a rewarding or disappointing experience depending on a number of factors, and we recommend that any executive considering joining a family business evaluate the following:
Has the family agreed on the hire?
How well has the position been defined?
How many individuals have previously held the same position? Turnover, particularly in the C-suite, can be a red flag indicating that the family is not ready for a nonfamily executive;
How are business decisions made? Cultural fit may be influenced by whether the business owner makes key decisions independently or in a distributed fashion;
How does the team operate in terms of executing the business? A well-functioning team is empowered to operationalize projects and business imperatives timely and successfully;
Understand the business owner’s goals; recognize these goals may be focused on objectives other than increasing revenue and growth, such as philanthropy or creating a legacy;
Evaluate the strengths and challenges of the current team and look for signs of dysfunction among family members;
Get to know family members individually, because they may have different goals and objectives; what are the family dynamics in play?
Leslie Diorio has joined Ice Miller LLP as Director of Legal Recruitment. Ms. Diorio is a dedicated recruiting executive skilled in management, strategy, talent assessment, training, and data analytics. Previously, Ms. Diorio was Vice President, Talent Recruiting at Axiom where she acquired more than 20 years of legal recruitment experience.
Learn more about Ms. Diorio here.
This search was conducted and completed by Managing Director John M. Mann and Associate Jonathan Daniels.
Patrick O’Connor has been named Chief Business Development & Marketing Officer for Holland & Knight LLP. Mr. O’Connor joins Holland & Knight from Big Four public accounting and consulting firm Ernst & Young LLP. He has more than 25 years of strategic and operational business development, marketing, and commercial leadership experience.
Learn more about Mr. O’Connor here.
Managing Directors John Lamar, Jean Lenzner, and William Lepiesza conducted and completed this search.
Ryan Kovach has joined PilotLegis as Assistant Executive Director. Mr. Kovach is a seasoned leader focusing on compliance, auditing, contract negotiation, policy development, information security and training.
Learn more about Mr. Kovach here.
Amanda K. Brady, Managing Director/Chief Client Officer, conducted and completed this search.
The Alexander Group provides insights on corporate board recruitment and how to attain a board seat. This guide will help executives take strategic steps to secure a board position, drawing on expertise from our experience in executive search and corporate governance.
One of the most frequently asked questions we get about C-level board recruitment is, “How do I get on a corporate board if I’m not already on a board?” The hardest board will be your first board.
Here is what you need to know.
A board seat is usually not a position for which you apply. It is much more like a sorority, fraternity, or even a posh club: Candidacy is by invitation only. While visiting and making contacts with search firms is helpful, it should not be your only strategy. Search firms fill only a relatively small percentage of board seats, though this number is increasing due to the need for highly specialized talents and a commitment to greater diversity.
Because someone can work and still serve on a board, it’s relatively easy for board members to recruit friends, former colleagues, or executives with whom they’ve done business. A search firm may not be as helpful to you in seeking a board position as it would be if you were looking for a C-suite role simply because board searches are not put out to search nearly as often as executive positions are.
Secondly, board positions do not have as much turnover as C-suite roles. The average tenure for directors in the larger companies of the S&P 500 Index and the broader Russell 3000 index is nearly ten years.
Lastly, it is expensive. Search firms charge anywhere from $70,000 to $200,000 to complete board searches. Many Boards inquire about their network before retaining executive board search services.
What value could you bring to a board? Determine the industry and type of company where your background would be an asset. Would you meet the requirements to serve on a company’s Audit Committee? Do you have a background in a sought-after functional area, such as compliance, data security, or executive compensation? Are you a diversity candidate? There are many functional areas or qualifications that boards seek to ensure they have a well-rounded board.
Prepare an “elevator” speech that you will use to introduce your candidacy to executive board search services and sources of referrals for board positions that articulate what you have to offer. You will also need a different resume highlighting your value to a board, your ability to represent shareholders and interactions with your own or other boards.
What would someone learn about you if they Googled your name? Does your resume reinforce the assets you would bring to a board? (Define your strengths; see number 2 above). Who are you, and how have you established yourself? What is your reputation? What enterprise challenges have you faced and successfully navigated?
It is not enough that you are good at what you do. Being selected for a board requires both an internal and external effort. This requirement is especially important if you are not currently working. One of the fastest ways to disqualify yourself from a board is not to be “current.” Today, board members must be up to date with changes in business and technology. To this end, it is critical to become versed in social media. Have a LinkedIn profile complete with a picture. Have an account with—and understand how to use—Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok (even if you don’t use it). Submit articles, blogs, or comments to industry association websites and publications. Engage in online dialog with your peers on social media. Publish an article on LinkedIn that delves into your area of expertise.
Landing a board seat is both a numbers game and a contacts game. Let your investment banking, law, bank, public accounting, and consulting firm contacts know of your interest in being on a board and the value you would bring. Use LinkedIn to identify board members of companies whom you can contact. Note if any of the directors are close to retirement. Many individuals have found board positions by contacting venture capital firms. In addition to search firms, check out top registries such as the National Association of Corporate Directors, Catalyst (for women), and various universities that have board training programs. Stanford, Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management, and Dartmouth offer corporate governance programs.
Be willing to start small. Are there any not-for-profits for which you have a passion? If so, volunteer to be on their board, even locally. Are there small companies that are looking for a volunteer board? What about your church, child’s school, or trade association? Once you’re on an organization’s board, fellow board members are often senior executives from public companies with whom you can network. It may take two or three not-for-profit boards before you can join a for-profit board. We know several executives who got their start on public boards by working with emerging growth companies and rode with those companies as they went from a garage operation to a Fortune 1000 company.
Most executives agree that it is harder to land their first board position than actually to serve on a board. Look at your contacts and networking as investing in one board and future Board positions. Not surprisingly, most search firms who conduct board searches look first to those already serving on public boards.
Remember, landing a board seat takes dedication, strategic positioning, and consistent networking efforts. When you understand the intricacies of corporate board recruitment, refining your personal brand, and making yourself visible within relevant circles, you will increase your chances of attaining that coveted position. Remember, the journey to your first board seat is often the hardest, but the relationships you foster and the expertise you build along the way are invaluable assets.
The Alexander Group remains committed to guiding ambitious executives through every step of corporate board recruitment, leveraging our experience to ensure that leaders find roles where they can truly make an impact.
Additional resources:
The Executive Leadership Council: Helps provide opportunities for African American executives.The Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility: Serves as a resource for Hispanic executives vying for board service.
