National law firm, Carlton Fields, appoints Maria Anderson to lead attorney recruiting, development, and retention strategies.

Headshot of Maria Anderson as Director of Legal Talent Management at Carlton Fields

Client: Carlton Fields | Role: Director of Legal Talent Management | Candidate: Maria Anderson

Recruiters: John Mann, Managing Director; Michael Doering, Senior Associate

Overview

Carlton Fields, a nationally recognized law firm serving a wide range of industries, partnered with The Alexander Group, a global executive search firm, to recruit a Director of Legal Talent Management. As the firm continued its strategic growth, it needed a proven leader to oversee attorney recruitment, professional development programs, and long-term retention strategies across its offices.

Key Leadership Need

Carlton Fields sought a Director of Legal Talent Management who could lead full-cycle recruiting, design structured professional development initiatives, and strengthen the firm’s attorney engagement and retention programs. The ideal candidate would bring a blend of operational leadership, recruiting expertise, and a focus on attorney career advancement within a client-focused law firm environment.

The Alexander Group’s Approach

Managing Director John Mann and Director Michael Doering conducted a targeted search, focusing on legal recruiting executives with strong leadership backgrounds in midsize and large law firms.

Search priorities include:

  • Deep experience in lateral partner, associate, and summer associate recruitment
  • Strong focus on talent development, retention programming, and DEI initiatives
  • Ability to build scalable frameworks to support attorney engagement and firm culture

Maria Anderson stood out due to her nearly two decades of leadership at Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, where she served as Director of Legal Personnel and Recruitment, overseeing attorney hiring, training, and career progression programs.

Successful Placement and Impact

Maria Anderson joins Carlton Fields as Director of Legal Talent Management. She will oversee attorney recruiting, design professional development initiatives, and collaborate with leadership to align talent strategies with the firm’s long-term growth goals.

Immediate Impact:

  • Enhances lateral hiring and summer associate recruitment processes
  • Develops formalized career development frameworks for attorneys at all levels
  • Launches attorney retention and engagement programs tailored to practice group needs
  • Strengthens the firm’s overall attorney experience and internal mobility opportunities

About Carlton Fields

Carlton Fields is a national law firm with offices across the Southeast and nationwide, serving clients in sectors including financial services, healthcare, construction, and technology. The firm is recognized for its commitment to client service, collaboration, and legal innovation.

About The Alexander Group

The Alexander Group is an executive search firm headquartered in Houston. The firm specializes in placing senior leadership across legal services, life sciences, healthcare, financial services, energy, technology, consumer goods, and nonprofit sectors, helping clients achieve growth through strategic talent acquisition.

Ready to transform your leadership team with proven talent? Partner with The Alexander Group to find the executives who will drive your growth.

A few months ago, I reached out to an individual at a Fortune 500 company about a potential opportunity with a client. His background was unusual in that he had leaped from a domestic role into a position with substantial global responsibility. As it turns out, there was a story there.

In his prior role, he had been in close competition with a colleague for an Asia Pacific position. He had more experience than his colleague and had been working long hours in preparation for the move. When his colleague was awarded the role however, he was dumbfounded. He’d been passed over for the promotion, and his spirit was crushed.

This is not an uncommon story. Many strong performers are ambitious and enthusiastic for their next internal role. Getting passed over is disheartening. The real question is, what do you do next?

Take a deep breath… keep your cool

After taking a few days to process his emotions, this executive spoke to his managers to garner a better understanding of the situation. They reassured him that big things were in the works. They encouraged him to maintain his work ethic and get better acquainted with what the company was doing—not only in Asia, but on a global scale.

Two years later, a global position opened in the organization and, today, he manages every region across the globe. And the colleague who was promoted to the APAC position? That colleague now reports to him.

He is a perfect example of what to do when faced with professional setbacks. Disappointment, anger, and frustration are natural reactions but “in the moment, those emotions may prompt you to vent to the wrong people, snap at your manager or, worse—quit,” warns Mike Guerchon, Chief People Officer at Okta. It’s crucial to remember that “how you confront difficult situations is a reflection of your maturity and readiness to take a leadership position.” Keep your composure and maintain a professional demeanor.

Also, be sure to not let this disappointment reflect poorly on your performance. You still have a team to manage, targets to achieve and numbers to nail. “Don’t let those emotions interfere with your productivity,” writes Forbes contributor Andy Molinsky. Resilience is key. How you deal with disappointment demonstrates your EQ and readiness to take on additional leadership responsibilities.

“It’s not always possible to make things better, but it is always possible to make things worse,” advised Ben Dattner, author of The Blame Game and founder of Dattner Consulting. This is critical to remember while emotions are running high. Take a deep breath, go through the emotions once you have left the office, and collect your thoughts on how to proceed.

Talk to your manager

After the heat of the moment has passed, and your emotions have calmed, approach your manager and have a candid conversation. Listen closely, and be inquisitive.

While a combination of variables can influence internal talent decisions, here are a few common culprits that may be at play:

  1. Background is too light. Every organization has specific needs. If the role encompasses a broad range of responsibilities, you may be missing a key component, such as international experience, change management or business development.
  2. Too experienced. Yes, it happens! Fulfillment requires a balance between the knowledge to get the job done and the opportunity to grow. If you can do the role in your sleep, you’ll be bored in less than a year and casting your eye to the horizon.
  3. Lack of gravitas. Do you project a polished, professional approach? Are you engaging, calm and confident? Consider how you connect with clients, colleagues and the highest levels of management.
  4. Politics. “As much as we all wish promotions would go to the most talented, hardworking and dedicated people,” writes one Forbes contributor, “decades of office politics tell us that’s not always the case.”
  5. Bad timing. Are you halfway through a critical project? Been in your role less than a year or two? Are organizational changes in the works that may impact your position? Timing is everything, and sometimes beyond your control.
  6. It’s not you. Sometimes, there is simply someone better suited for the role. Maybe the person you were up against has slightly more experience or contributed to the bottom line in a way you’re not aware of. Or there could be broader, long-term factors involved.

Plan your next move

Now that you’ve gone through the emotions and have gained a clearer understanding as to why you were passed up, it’s time to transform a negative situation into a springboard for opportunity.

  • If you discover you are missing specific experience, talk to your manager about a career plan so you get that experience. Reinvest in your current role, and look for opportunities to innovate and expand your scope of work.
  • Are you missing soft skills, such as diplomacy, communication skills or emotional intelligence? Ask a mentor for honest feedback and get coaching if you need to. Take up a management training course to hone leadership qualities.
  • Bad timing? Short tenures and unfinished projects reflect poorly on you and disrupt your organization’s productivity. Invest more time in your current role. It will pay off in the long term.
  • If you suspect politics are at play, find a way to heal bad blood. Network with the people in the department or region to which you aspire. Build a base of positive support, especially among top leaders.

Know when to leave

Internal opportunities for advancement can be limited, especially as you rise to more senior levels. If, after careful assessment, you believe you’ve reached an impasse, it may be time to explore external opportunities.

While conducting a search for a Chief Marketing Officer for an Am Law 100 firm, I met a potential candidate who at the time served as a Director of Marketing. I asked her why she was considering a new opportunity. She told me that there had been turnover in the senior leadership at her firm, and most of the C-suite had turned over in the past two years. When the CMO announced his retirement, she was confident that she would be offered the position. Around the same time, however, a new Chief Operating Officer joined the firm and, rather than promoting from within, he brought the CMO from his former firm on board.

This candidate handled the situation with grace and humility, but quietly started exploring the market. She knew she was ready for the next step in her career, and without a viable near-term option at her current firm, she prepared to make her move.

Today, she is Chief Marketing Officer at a prestigious and profitable international law firm. She left her former firm on good terms and exemplifies the type of individual our clients retain us to recruit.

“Getting passed over for a promotion can feel like an impossible-to-overcome roadblock in your career path,” advises one Forbes contributor. “But by learning as much as you can from what went wrong and staying resilient, you can turn a negative into a positive that’ll help you land the next one.”

The Milken Institute, a global think tank, appoints Kevin Herglotz to lead business development, partnerships, and strategic growth initiatives.

Headshot of Kevin Herglotz as Executive Vice President of Institutional Advancement at The Milken Institute

Client: Milken Institute | Role: Executive Vice President, Institutional Advancement | Candidate: Kevin Herglotz

Recruiters: Jane Howze, Managing Director; Sarah Mitchell, Director

Overview

The Milken Institute, a globally recognized nonprofit think tank advancing solutions to the world’s most critical challenges, partnered with The Alexander Group, a global executive search firm, to recruit an Executive Vice President of Institutional Advancement. As the Institute expanded its global impact, it sought a dynamic executive leader to drive business development, institutional partnerships, fundraising, marketing, and government engagement initiatives.

Key Leadership Need

The Milken Institute was looking for an Executive Vice President of Institutional Advancement who could lead cross-functional teams spanning business development, global events, marketing and communications, and external affairs. The role required a leader with proven expertise in scaling nonprofit and mission-driven organizations, building international partnerships, and developing high-impact strategic initiatives.

The Alexander Group’s Approach

Managing Director Jane Howze and Director Sarah Mitchell conducted a national search targeting senior executives with experience across nonprofit advancement, business development, strategic partnerships, and global communications.

Search priorities included:

  • Proven leadership scaling nonprofit, governmental, or mission-driven organizations
  • Expertise in building global partnerships, marketing, and event management strategies
  • Strong strategic planning and team leadership capabilities

Kevin Herglotz emerged as the leading candidate with more than three decades of experience in executive leadership roles spanning government, business, and nonprofits, including his prior leadership at HPA Strategies, the National AIDS Memorial, and Safeway.

Successful Placement and Impact

Kevin Herglotz joins The Milken Institute as Executive Vice President of Institutional Advancement. He will lead efforts to expand the Institute’s partnerships, drive business and program development, and elevate the Institute’s visibility and influence globally.

Immediate Impact:

  • Oversees global business development, marketing, communications, and government relations initiatives
  • Leads strategic partnerships to support the Institute’s global conferences and policy platforms
  • Develops growth strategies aligned with the Institute’s long-term mission objectives
  • Strengthens internal team performance across advancement functions

About The Milken Institute

The Milken Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan think tank that advances collaborative solutions to global challenges by connecting leaders in finance, public health, technology, philanthropy, and public policy. Through events, research, and partnerships, the Institute drives impactful initiatives that improve lives worldwide.

About The Alexander Group

The Alexander Group is an executive search firm based in Houston, known for delivering transformative leadership across nonprofit, healthcare, legal services, financial services, life sciences, technology, and energy sectors. The firm partners with organizations seeking growth, innovation, and global impact through strategic leadership placements.

Seeking proven leaders to elevate your mission-driven organization? Partner with The Alexander Group to secure the executives who create impact.

The American Heart Association, a national nonprofit organization, appoints Sharlene Jenner to drive digital marketing innovation and engagement.

Headshot of Sharlene Jenner as SVP of Digital Marketing at The American Heart Association

Client: The American Heart Association | Role: SVP, Digital Marketing | Candidate: Sharlene Jenner

Recruiters: Amanda K. Brady, Managing Director; Jean Lenzner, Managing Director

Overview

The American Heart Association is the nation’s oldest and largest voluntary organization dedicated to fighting heart disease and stroke. It partnered with The Alexander Group, a global executive search firm, to recruit a Senior Vice President of Digital Marketing. As the organization sought to strengthen its digital-first engagement strategy, it needed a visionary marketing leader to amplify its science-driven mission through digital innovation, emerging technologies, and strategic storytelling.

Key Leadership Need

The American Heart Association sought an SVP of Digital Marketing who could drive integrated digital marketing strategies, leverage emerging technologies like AI for personalized engagement, and align marketing initiatives with the organization’s mission-driven goals. The ideal candidate would bring deep expertise in digital ecosystem leadership, omnichannel marketing, and data-driven decision-making in a nonprofit or large-scale mission-driven environment.

The Alexander Group’s Approach

Managing Directors Amanda K. Brady and Jean Lenzner lead a national search to identify digital marketing executives with proven success in scaling engagement strategies, driving innovation, and aligning digital ecosystems with organizational impact goals.

Search priorities included:

  • Expertise in digital transformation, omnichannel marketing, and marketing technology leadership
  • Proven ability to lead high-performing teams and integrate emerging technologies into marketing strategy
  • Experience aligning digital marketing strategies with organizational missions and revenue growth initiatives

Sharlene Jenner rose to the top with over two decades of leadership experience at organizations such as Vizient, AbelsonTaylor, and Hilton Worldwide, where she specialized in driving digital innovation, marketing transformation, and audience-centered storytelling strategies.

Successful Placement and Impact

Sharlene Jenner joins The American Heart Association as SVP of Digital Marketing. She oversees the strategy and execution of digital marketing initiatives, content strategy, and the integration of emerging technologies to drive relevance, engagement, and revenue growth across both consumer and scientific audiences.

Immediate Impact:

  • Leads digital engagement strategies aligned with the AHA’s brand and mission
  • Introduces AI-driven personalization and data analytics to enhance marketing campaigns
  • Strengthens omnichannel marketing efforts across consumer, professional, and donor audiences
  • Elevates the AHA’s digital brand presence through innovative content and storytelling

About The American Heart Association

The American Heart Association is a nonprofit organization devoted to saving people from heart disease and stroke, the two leading causes of death worldwide. Through groundbreaking research, education, and advocacy efforts, the Association helps millions live longer, healthier lives.

About The Alexander Group

The Alexander Group is an international executive search firm headquartered in Houston. Serving nonprofits, healthcare organizations, legal services, technology firms, and more, The Alexander Group helps mission-driven organizations secure transformative leadership to drive strategic impact and sustainable growth.

Looking to elevate your organization’s digital strategy? Partner with The Alexander Group to find the visionary leaders who drive engagement and growth.

National insurance leader, GEICO, appoints Tangela Richter to lead legal operations, regulatory compliance, and risk management.

Headshot of Tangela Richter as General Counsel at GEICO

Client: GEICO | Role: General Counsel | Candidate: Tangela Richter

Recruiters: John Lamar, Managing Director; Sarah Mitchell, Director

Overview

GEICO (Government Employees Insurance Company) is one of the largest and most recognized auto insurance companies in the United States. It partnered with The Alexander Group, a global executive search firm, to recruit a General Counsel. As GEICO continues to expand and navigate a dynamic regulatory environment, it sought a highly experienced legal leader to oversee all aspects of legal operations, corporate governance, compliance, and risk management.

Key Leadership Need

GEICO wanted a General Counsel who could lead the company’s legal strategy across regulatory compliance, corporate governance, litigation, risk management, and M&A support. The ideal candidate would possess extensive experience advising senior leadership teams, overseeing large legal departments, and aligning legal strategy with organizational growth objectives in a fast-paced environment.

The Alexander Group’s Approach

Managing Director John Lamar and Director Sarah Mitchell conducted a focused national search targeting senior legal executives with extensive leadership experience in insurance, financial services, and regulated industries.

Search priorities included:

  • Expertise in corporate governance, securities law, regulatory compliance, and litigation management
  • Proven ability to advise C-suite leadership on strategic initiatives and operational matters
  • Experience leading large, high-performing legal teams in highly regulated environments

Tangela Richter emerged as the ideal candidate, bringing over two decades of leadership experience across organizations such as Wells Fargo, American Express, LendingClub, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, where she consistently advised on governance, compliance, and strategic legal issues.

Successful Placement and Impact

Tangela Richter joins GEICO as General Counsel. She will lead all legal, regulatory, compliance, and risk management functions, supporting GEICO’s growth strategies while ensuring operational integrity across its national footprint.

Immediate Impact:

  • Strengthens corporate governance practices and regulatory compliance frameworks
  • Advises senior leadership on legal risk and business strategy alignment
  • Leads internal and external counsel management for operational efficiency
  • Develops proactive legal strategies to support the company’s continued expansion

About GEICO

GEICO is a national provider of auto insurance and related products, serving millions of policyholders throughout the United States. As a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, GEICO is dedicated to providing affordable and reliable insurance services while upholding a customer-first philosophy.

About The Alexander Group

The Alexander Group is a global executive search firm based in Houston. The firm partners with leading organizations in insurance, financial services, technology, healthcare, and professional services to recruit senior leaders who drive innovation, growth, and operational excellence.Building a world-class leadership team starts with the right search partner.

Discover how The Alexander Group helps organizations secure transformative legal and executive talent.

Milbank LLP, an elite global law firm appoints Anne Radke to lead talent strategy and HR operations.

Client: Milbank LLP | Role: Director of Human Resources | Candidate: Anne Radke

Recruiter: Sarah Mitchell, Director

Red M for Milbank on black and white background

Overview

Milbank LLP, a premier international law firm with a reputation for excellence in complex financial and transactional matters, partners with The Alexander Group, a global executive search firm, to recruit a Director of Human Resources. As the firm grows its international reach and enhances internal operations, it needs a seasoned HR leader to strengthen talent systems, support firm culture, and align human capital strategy with business priorities.

Key Leadership Need

Milbank sought a Director of Human Resources who could:

  • Lead firmwide HR operations.
  • Support the professional development of attorneys and staff.
  • Implement best practices across recruitment, retention, performance management, and employee engagement. 

The ideal candidate would bring law firm or professional services experience and a strong track record of building scalable HR systems within high-performance environments.

The Alexander Group’s Approach

Director Sarah Mitchell led the search, focusing on HR executives with experience managing human capital strategy in fast-paced, global organizations.

Search priorities included:

  • Experience in a law firm or professional services HR leadership
  • Ability to align HR operations with organizational goals and cultural values
  • Strength in employee relations, development programs, and performance management

Anne Radke emerged as the ideal fit, bringing a clear strategic mindset and proven operational discipline, along with experience building inclusive, people-first HR programs that scale.

Successful Placement and Impact

Anne Radke will lead the firm’s HR operations, working closely with leadership to enhance employee experience, modernize HR systems, and build processes that support growth and retention across Milbank’s global offices.

Immediate Impact:

  • Lead HR planning and operational improvements across departments.
  • Develop initiatives to support attorney and staff engagement and retention.
  • Align HR practices with the firm’s long-term talent development goals.
  • Enhance infrastructure to support future scale and cultural continuity.

About Milbank LLP

Milbank LLP is a global law firm with offices across the Americas, Europe, and Asia. The firm is widely recognized for its strengths in capital markets, project finance, restructuring, and M&A, and is known for a client-focused approach rooted in excellence, innovation, and collaboration.

About The Alexander Group

The Alexander Group is a global executive search firm headquartered in Houston. With deep expertise in legal, professional services, financial, and corporate sectors, the firm helps leading organizations identify and hire the senior leaders who move strategy forward and deepen culture.

Need help building a leadership team that drives performance and culture? The Alexander Group delivers the talent that makes transformation possible.

How is DEI Changing - Leaders discus DEI

Key Points:

  • How is DEI changing? Many companies are moving towards more subtle, “Quiet DEI” initiatives, continuing their commitment to diversity without explicitly labeling it as DEI.
  • There is a continued leadership commitment to DEI. Despite reduced public enthusiasm, many C-suite leaders remain dedicated to promoting DEI values within their organizations.
  • Evolving DEI Strategies include a focus on organically integrating diversity efforts into broader business practices to better capture everyday workplace cultures.

Peruse the headlines, and it seems the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) movement has moved on—at least for now.

The roster of companies distancing themselves from DEI hiring and practices is a Who’s Who of familiar names—Zoom, Home Depot, DoorDash, Tractor Supply, and Lyft. Social and cultural tastemakers Meta, Tesla, and X join the mix of major corporations that cut DEI teams by 50 percent or more in 2023. 

It’s a far cry and a fast fall from the surge of DEI hiring and policies established in the wake of George Floyd’s 2020 death. Whether moved by altruism, public pressure, or even economic gains, American companies prioritized racial equality, building teams dedicated to diversity, equity, and inclusion. 

Evolution of DEI Practices

The push for DEI rose to public consciousness in 2020, but its roots are embedded in the Civil Rights movements of the 1950s and 1960s. Affirmative action and equal employment legislation such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Pay Act of 1963, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 were the foundation for DEI, setting the stage for future growth.

.Fast forward 65 years, and you can see how DEI is changing in practice in academia and corporations worldwide.

The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision overturning affirmative action in college admissions fueled the DEI pushback, creating a domino effect throughout academia.

Shifts in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives in Education

The Chronicle of Higher Education tracks how DEI is changing through legislation and found state legislators have introduced at least 65 anti-DEI bills since 2023. Florida, North Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Texas have passed legislation that prohibits colleges from having diversity, equity, and inclusion offices or staff and bans mandatory diversity training, among other things.

The decision also prompted executives nationwide to reexamine their diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, resulting in the disbanding of programs and internal DEI hires.

Adjustments in DEI Implementation in the Corporate Sector

Most recently, Tractor Supply Co., the largest rural lifestyle retailer in the U.S., took a public step back from its robust DEI policies, citing customer feedback as the reason for eliminating its carbon emissions goals and DEI programs.

With its highly respected board and management group and legacy of community engagement, the company made the decision out of respect for its customers, who include recreational farmers, ranchers, homeowners, gardeners, and pet enthusiasts.

In a press release on June 27, 2024, Tractor Supply Co. said, “We work hard to live up to our Mission and Values every day and represent the values of the communities and customers we serve. We have heard from customers that we have disappointed them. We have taken this feedback to heart.”

The company listed five key changes in the release, including “…eliminating DEI roles and retiring our current DEI goals while still ensuring a respectful environment” and “no longer submitting data to the Human Rights Campaign.”

Tractor Supply Co. isn’t alone in its DEI shift.

Changing Trends in DEI Approaches in Workplace Settings

Washington Post reporter Taylor Telford disclosed that Zoom’s chief operating officer Aparna Bawa told employees the company would replace its internal DEI team with DEI consultants who would “champion inclusion by embedding our values…directly into our people programs rather than as a separate initiative” according to a Jan. 29 memo.

Elon Musk, the billionaire owner of X, Tesla, and SpaceX, echoed the sentiments of billionaire investor Bill Ackman, who shared his thoughts about DEI on X, calling it “inherently a racist and illegal movement in its implementation even if it purports to work on behalf of the so-called oppressed.” 

Musk followed Ackman’s post with his own, saying, “DEI is just another word for racism. Shame on anyone who uses it. DEI, because it discriminates on the basis of race, gender, and many other factors, is not merely immoral, it is also illegal.”

Data from the job search site Indeed further supports how DEI is changing. There is a decline of dedicated DEI policies with a 23 percent decline in job postings with “DEI” in the title or description between November 2022 and November 2023.

The Pew Research Center data shows how the political fault lines reflect the country’s thoughts about DEI. The Pew survey found that 78% of Democratic and Democratic-leaning workers say focusing on DEI at work is a good thing, compared with 30% of Republican and Republican-leaning workers.

How Is DEI Changing or Expanding? 

So that’s it, then? Is DEI done? After all, Musk said DEI is immoral, and data shows a reverse in hiring, so it must be true.

Well, not exactly.

How is DEI Changing - Evolving DEI

Despite data and the change in hiring, many companies are pursuing Quiet DEI, reframing efforts without using acronyms.

A November 2023 survey conducted by Littler Mendelson P.C., the largest global law practice devoted to representing management in employment, employee benefits, and labor law matters, revealed that despite the gloom and doom of the headlines, the C-suite is still actively pursuing and expanding its diversity, equity, and inclusion strategies.

More than 300 C-suite executives, including Chief Executive Officers, Chief Legal Officers, and Chief Diversity Officers representing a diverse range of industries and company sizes, responded to the survey, which shed light on DEI’s future.

Highlights include the following:

  • More than half of U.S. executives say their organizations have expanded their diversity, equity, and inclusion strategies over the past year despite an increased backlash against broader diversity initiatives.
  • 57% of C-suite executives in the U.S. said they had grown their diversity commitments over the past 12 months, even as 59% reported growing opposition to diversity programs in the U.S. following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to roll back affirmative-action college admissions policies in June 2023.
  • 91% of C-suite leaders say the Supreme Court rulings have not lessened their prioritization of DEI.

“Most of the business leaders with whom I speak across the professional services and nonprofit sectors continue to support a broad definition of diversity, equity, and inclusion that rejects the echo chambers of old and capitalizes on how the differences make them stronger,” said Amanda K. Brady, Managing Director and Chief Client Officer, The Alexander Group.

Transition of DEI Programs Should Be Straightforward

There is room for improvement, or rather clarity of program execution. Thirty-five percent of the executives said their organizations need clear plans and goals relating to DEI initiatives.

The survey revealed the most popular initiatives tend to be straightforward and established. These include providing training and professional development opportunities to diverse employees and providing organization-wide DEI or “implicit bias” training and educational resources, which have already been implemented or are in the planning stages at 77% of organizations.

About three-quarters of executives (73%) also say their organizations already provide or plan to develop mentorship opportunities for diverse employees.

This data rings true for Jane Howze, Managing Director of The Alexander Group. She has experienced multiple shifts across the executive recruiting landscape throughout her career and says DEI hiring practices may currently look different, but they have taken root.

“Our firm has seen many trends over its 40-year history, and the pendulum always swings back. While there may be a pause in highlighting DEI initiatives, you must think about it in the long term, and we do,” Howze said.

How Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion are Evolving To Stay In Place

How is DEI Changing - Caroline Wanga

Growing DEI effectively is undoubtedly an evolving process. Caroline Wanga, President and CEO of Essence Ventures, Co-Founder of WangaWoman, and former Chief Culture, Diversity, and Inclusion Officer at Target, thinks it’s time for corporate DEI efforts to take a step back and ask critical questions.

These are Wanga’s five prompts for reframing the corporate DEI discussion:

1. Do your workplace policies give individuals permission to express themselves and ask for what they need?

For the amount of time I invested in being in all the right places for DEI, none of my numbers moved because I was there. My numbers moved when people saw me come to work with dreadlocks and finally started wearing their vacation braids to work.”

2. Do your mentorship programs pair employees based on their appearance or the deeper qualities they need to succeed?

Corporate America mentorship should be aligned to the needs of the person and the best person who can give them that. What they happen to look like should not be a factor in whether they’re a good mentor.”

3. Does your workplace offer space for employees to truly listen to each other?

We were teaching everybody how to come out and say stuff that makes people uncomfortable… What we forgot to do is teach people how to listen to it.”

4. Do your DEI programs foster personal accountability and action?

The next time you use the word ‘ ’instead of saying I need DEI to do this, or I’m worried that DEI is doing this, take out the word ‘ ’and put your name and see how you feel. Because if you’re not doing it, I don’t care about DEI.”

5. Are your DEI initiatives primarily for meeting business objectives or creating a more humane workplace?

DEI is not about ‘How many of this do you have? ’DEI is not about meeting goals. DEI is about teaching people how to get in touch with what they are good at.”

Bottom line in answer to “How is DEI changing in the future?”

DEI initiatives aren’t going anywhere.

“The firms I have spoken to indicated they are doubling down on their DEI initiatives,” said John Lamar, Managing Director of The Alexander Group. “Prioritizing diversity in their workforce, leadership, and client engagements will continue, as will efforts on creating an inclusive workplace culture.”

Transformations in DEI Strategies and Progression of DEI Efforts By Executive Leadership

The evolution of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) efforts highlights that while public enthusiasm for DEI may have declined, these initiatives are far from over. Many organizations are transitioning to a more discreet, “Quiet DEI” approach, showing continued individual leadership commitment despite broader corporate pullbacks. Leaders remain dedicated to organically embedding DEI principles into business practices, underscoring the importance of diversity as a long-term goal. As DEI strategies adapt, the focus shifts toward sustainable integration that reflects the fundamental values of leadership and employees.

Moving forward, consider how your organization can continue to prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion in the evolving workplace landscape. Whether through quiet initiatives or more visible commitments, DEI should remain integral to leadership strategy. Connect with us to learn more about integrating DEI seamlessly into your business practices.

As one Chief Strategy Officer explained, “I am responsible for nothing and accountable for everything.” Because the CSO is a relatively new role, it has yet to develop a consensus definition. In a recent survey, Deloitte found that 37 percent of the CSOs they surveyed revealed that strategy has existed as a formal function for less than five years at their organization. Deloitte published a white paper describing six distinct roles of a CSO:

  1. The Advisor, who translates the various perspectives of the organization’s senior leadership into a comprehensive corporate strategic plan.
  2. The Sentinel, who monitors the market for changes that could impact their organization’s ability to remain competitive and have medium- and long-term scenario plans in place.
  3. The Banker who addresses lapses in business development opportunities, drives Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A;) deals, licensing deals, and venture capital investments that support the strategic plan.
  4. The Engineer who ensures that the organization’s various business units effectively execute the strategic plan.
  5. The Chief of Staff, who is a liaison between the CEO, outside contractors, and consultants. They drive projects forward and communicate the strategy to internal stakeholders.
  6. The Special Projects Leader, who evaluates adjacent markets and executes strategic objectives such as geographic expansion.

The Characteristics of a Successful CSO

The characteristics of a successful CSO are as varied as the role’s responsibilities. Ernst & Young surveyed numerous executives to understand what it takes to be a successful Chief Strategy Officer. Most importantly, a CSO needs to have a good relationship with their CEO. The two need to be on the same page as the organization’s overall strategy, and a CSO must challenge their CEO when their ideas do not align with the plan.

A CSO also needs to have a sound working knowledge of financial best practices to foster a good working relationship with their organization’s Chief Financial Officer. A well-developed strategy that does not have a financial foundation is ultimately an exercise in futility. A successful CSO must also be up-to-date with the latest advances in technology and collaborate with their Chief Information Officer to develop new ways to leverage technology to achieve their organization’s long-term goals.

In addition to developing and maintaining good working relationships with their fellow senior executives, an effective CSO needs their role clearly defined with a scope appropriate for their company’s size. A CSO needs to know what is and isn’t under their purview, which must also be communicated and agreed upon by the other members of the senior executive team. A consensus among the executive team will prevent any feelings of encroachment on their respective duties.

A black background with a black square

Description automatically generated with medium confidencePost-it "What Next?"What is the career trajectory for someone in the chief strategy officer role?

Career Progression for the CSO

For many organizations, the strategy department is used as a way to identify top talent and to prepare young managers for long-term success. Concurrently, many Chief Strategy Officers are moved into Profit & Loss (P&L;) executive positions within the company, based on the knowledge they have gained by working closely with line leadership to develop strategies. According to a survey conducted by Boston Consulting Group, “although only 41 percent of CSOs sit on the executive committee or management board, they do tend to rise in the executive ranks, with 67 percent either becoming the head of a business unit or taking on another role on the executive committee.”

Deloitte’s 2020 survey of Chief Strategy Officers confirmed this natural progression. While 48 percent of CSOs surveyed said they wanted to ascend to the CEO role within five years, it is rare to be promoted directly to that position. The most well-known progression from CSO to CEO was PepsiCo’s former Chairman and CEO, Indra Nooyi, who previously served as the company’s Vice President of Strategy Development. After seven years in the role, she was promoted to Chief Financial Officer then Chief Executive Officer in 2006.

Some roadblocks for a CSO progressing to CEO are practical operational and P&L; management experience. Since the focus of the CSO role is long-term, success or failure in the role cannot be determined for many years. For these reasons, many strategy professionals move on to become line executives.

As the world works to move on from a pandemic that rocked the global economy, organizations must adapt to an ever-changing global marketplace, and the role of chief strategists has become more critical with each new challenge. The Chief Strategy Officer’s job is to predict what other challenges lay just over the horizon and how to best position their organization to remain competitive and achieve long-term success.

Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP appoints Alex Schoultheis to lead attorney recruitment, development, and integration strategy.

Headshot of Alex Schoultheis with Calfee logo

Client: Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP | Role: Chief Recruiting and Development Officer | Candidate: Alex Schoultheis

Recruiter: John M. Mann, Managing Director

Overview

Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP, a full-service law firm with offices across Ohio and Washington, D.C., partnered with The Alexander Group, a global executive search firm, to recruit a Chief Recruiting and Development Officer. As the firm continues to attract top legal talent and support attorney development, it seeks a forward-thinking leader to build scalable programs aligned with its strategic growth goals.

Key Leadership Need

Calfee seeks a Chief Recruiting and Development Officer to lead firmwide attorney hiring, integration, and career development. The ideal candidate brings a background in legal recruiting and talent development, strong strategic planning skills, and the ability to partner with firm leadership to drive growth and retention across practice areas.

The Alexander Group’s Approach

Managing Director John M. Mann conducts a national search focused on legal talent executives with experience in attorney recruiting, lateral integration, and firmwide professional development strategies.

Search priorities include:

  • Experience leading attorney hiring and development initiatives in law firm environments.
  • Strategic thinking across talent acquisition, onboarding, and training systems.
  • Strong collaboration skills to engage with firm leaders and practice group heads.

Alex Schoultheis rises to the top with nearly a decade of experience across firms like Squire Patton Boggs and Thompson Hine, where he leads legal talent teams and builds development systems that align with firmwide goals.

Successful Placement and Impact

Alex Schoultheis joins Calfee as Chief Recruiting and Development Officer. He leads the strategy and implementation of firmwide attorney recruiting, hiring, integration, and development initiatives, ensuring alignment with Calfee’s long-term business goals.

Immediate Impact:

  • Leads lateral and associate recruitment strategy across offices.
  • Builds integration programs to improve attorney onboarding and retention.
  • Develops structured development frameworks to support attorney growth and advancement.
  • Enhances firm culture through talent-driven leadership.

Insights from the Recruiter

“Alex is a high performer and precisely the Chief Legal Recruiting and Development Officer Calfee needs to build and elevate their recruiting function. His experience with sophisticated firms and background in the Ohio market will serve him well as Calfee continues to expand their outstanding practices. We are excited to see Alex utilize his technical skills and strong emotional intelligence at Calfee.”

John Mann, Managing Director, The Alexander Group

About Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP

Calfee is a nationally recognized law firm with more than 160 attorneys serving clients from offices in Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, and Washington, D.C. The firm is known for its practical legal guidance and deep industry insight across litigation, business law, government relations, and IP.

About The Alexander Group

The Alexander Group is a global executive search firm based in Houston. With decades of experience serving law firms, professional services organizations, and corporate leadership teams, the firm helps clients hire leaders who elevate performance and culture.

Searching for legal talent leadership that drives growth? The Alexander Group delivers the people behind your long-term success.

Anyone who has ever been involved with a not-for-profit will at some point be asked to serve on a search committee or lead a search committee’s search for a new CEO/President or senior officer. We have written previously about the responsibilities of search committee members and how candidates can prepare for a search committee interview but wanted to take a deeper look at the role of the Search Committee Chair. We turn to Steve Taylor, a leader in the not-for-profit community for nearly 30 years, who is currently serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Mission Officer of the Arthritis Foundation. Steve recently chaired the search committee for the President & CEO of the National Health Council which has been widely viewed as a well-run search with an outstanding result. Below, Steve answers the questions we are frequently asked as not-for-profits recruit using search committees.

How big should a search committee be?

I believe the ideal size is seven, including the Chairman who should also have a vote. You could possibly do nine or five, but frankly, if the Committee becomes too large, it can be hard to coordinate schedules. You have too many opinions in the discussions, and you want every voice to be heard. You’ll also want to make sure it’s an odd number; that way there is no tie.

Who should be on a search committee?

Much of it depends on the position. Ideally, one to three members of the Executive Committee should be on the Search Committee and supplement that with volunteers who represent different parts of the organization. I recommend looking at the various responsibilities of the position you are trying to fill. Which volunteers can best represent and understand these responsibilities? The key to a successful search committee is that you want members with perspective but who are not living in the past. On the other hand, you don’t want search committee members being so free-spirited they are substituting their vision for that of the Board’s.

The ideal Search Committee member understands the history of the organization as well as its future vision.

And that is what is so important when selecting volunteers to serve on a search committee: they need to be familiar [with] and embrace the Board’s vision for the organization and also represent different constituencies of the organization.

Should current employees sit on a search committee?

That is a question that many organizations wrestle with. Sometimes it can make sense, especially when you have long-term employees who understand the organization. But this is not a choice without challenges.

  • If there are internal candidates for the position, it can be difficult to ask a colleague [to] make an unbiased choice.
  • Secondly, a staff member on the Committee may not have the strategic view of the organization that a high-ranking volunteer or board member will have.
  • Thirdly, it can be sensitive for an employee to be involved in salary discussions involving the successful candidate.

What I typically recommend is that one of the Search Committee members serve as a liaison to a group of employees/staff. On the recent search I led for the National Health Council, I personally maintained contact with the senior leadership team. While I did not discuss individual candidates, I asked the search firm to solicit their opinions for the type of leaders we were seeking, and I communicated to them on the progress of the search.

Who selects the search firm, and what should be considered?

I can’t overemphasize the importance of a strong partnership with the search firm. You want it to be a partnership, not just a firm presenting resumes. The Chair should have meaningful input on selecting the search firm because they’ll be the one working [most] closely with them. Of course, the Search Committee reviews proposals and meets with a small number of finalists. But ultimately the Chair of the Search Committee should have a strong voice in selecting a search firm.

For me, it was critical that the search firm had experience in organizing and administratively providing infrastructure to the committee so that I and the Committee could focus on the candidates.

I also believe the Chair shouldn’t rely on the Search Committee or search firm to do all of the coordination. There will be times that it is important for the Chair to jump in to either facilitate meetings or deal with scheduling or personnel challenges. The search firm should be willing to do more than just conduct the search as many members of a search committee have full-time jobs.

I advise my colleagues running search committees to be very specific with what you would like the search firm to do.

Do you want them to:

  • Attend search committee meetings?
  • Set the agenda for search committee meetings?
  • Provide interview questions?

I believe you need a search firm to do anything the Search Committee and its Chairman cannot or do not want to do because of time restraints.

It is a given that a search firm needs to have a robust Rolodex, but I’m still trying to figure out how to evaluate that. [laughing] What you can evaluate is recent searches a search firm has conducted for similar positions. As we evaluated search firms, some listed searches they conducted more than a decade ago! That was a lifetime ago in the not-for-profit world.

And finally, I believe you need to find a search firm that is upfront and honest with you about who the lead staff will be—and that you have the opportunity to meet with that lead staff to ensure compatibility and understanding of the process you envision—before you finalize your selection on a firm.

What allowances did you make during COVID in the most recent search you chaired?

Overall, it worked out well. In certain ways, the process moved more efficiently given the Search Committee met by Zoom and the candidates were interviewed by the search firm and us for first-round interviews by Zoom. One advantage we had as a search committee is that we all knew each other—some better than others—but this familiarity allowed us to work together well virtually.

Once we narrowed the process to our finalists, we asked them to meet face to face, of course, social distancing, wearing masks, etc. with another search committee member and me. Despite adapting to video conferencing, meeting the candidate in person makes a big difference. To have a candidate being willing to invest the time, to travel to a meeting, meet a group of people, some in person, some virtually, was critical to the final steps of our process.

We were able to observe how they handled themselves in the middle of a pandemic, watch how they coordinated their presentation, and even how they arranged the papers on the conference table. In a virtual interview, you have no idea if the candidate has sticky notes all over their computer screen providing possible hints to questions. That was important to us because that’s what the job is going to be (ultimately): face-to-face meetings working with different constituencies and being able to communicate and think on their feet. Interestingly, I believe we would have ended up with the same candidate if we had conducted the search before COVID.

How do you, as a search committee chair, handle candidate withdrawals and surprises?

As a search committee chair or member, you understand that many of the candidates currently are in good positions, and you are hoping to attract them to your organization. You can’t get too nervous about that. It is part of the process. You reach for candidates, and some you attract, and some you lose. And if a candidate pulls out, I believe it’s better that they do it in the search process rather than later.

As for the second part of your question, as Chair, you have to be flexible, responsive, and nimble because issues arise that need to be acted on quickly. Several times, I had to reach out to Committee members individually to keep the process moving either because an issue arose on a Friday night or there was simply not the time to call a full committee meeting. You establish that at the beginning of the search so there is no misunderstanding. In every search, there may be small decisions made either by the chair or by a smaller group on the committee, because trying to get everyone together all the time isn’t possible, but ultimately the big decisions are made as a group.

How much time does it take to do a good job?

The time required ebbs and flows during the search. If you have a good search firm, as we did in using The Alexander Group, there’s less time initially because you allow them to do the search and trust their judgment on the candidates they’re presenting. The search committee chair is then free to focus on the higher-level items most important to finding the right candidate. Once the interview process is underway, you will need to be available for the search committee, search firm, [and] staff as the process unfolds. There is a significant time commitment required for the Chair. The organization needs someone who can make that time commitment because, if it is not a priority, you’ll never finish the search.

Who should be the Chair?

Choosing the right search committee chair is critical to a successful search. It needs to be a leader in the organization who understands its past but also understands the future vision of the organization. It does not have to be the current board chair. It could be a past board chair who might have more time because they’re not the current board chair. It is important that the chair can lead without supervision and is trusted by the board.